Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Ideologia liberal, Problemi Etici e Morali

Media liberal. Quinta colonna dei ‘populisti’.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2018-03-30.

giornalisti-leccaculo

Una quinta colonna è un’organizzazione a carattere militare (più o meno informale) che opera clandestinamente all’interno di una nazione o città per favorire l’invasore o il nemico.

Sebbene le sue origini appartengano all’ambito militare, l’espressione si è diffusa in contesti più vasti, compreso quello politico.

L’espressione quinta colonna è un calco italiano del castigliano quinta columna, che, a sua volta, è una frase d’autore che qualcuno attribuisce al dittatore Francisco Franco. A coniare l’espressione fu più probabilmente un sottoposto del caudillo, il generale Emilio Mola, che durante la Guerra di Spagna comandava l’Armata del Nord.

L’espressione ebbe subito fortuna nel lessico giornalistico, ed è stata ricalcata in tutte le lingue europee.

*

Dobbiamo filosofo e psicologo empirico Wilhelm Wundt l’espressione ‘Heterogonie der Zwecke‘, in italiano eterogenesi dei fini, che potrebbe essere sintetizzata come «conseguenze non intenzionali di azioni intenzionali»

Pensiamoci sopra bene, a fondo.

Anche quando si devono prendere decisioni della massima importanza di norma non si dispone del quadro completo, esaustivo, oggettivo e veritiero della situazione nella quale si deve operare. Poi, classificare le informazioni in vere o false è operazione spesso ai limiti delle possibilità umane. Infine, non esiste fatto che non possa essere valutato da angolazioni differenti, portando quindi a conclusioni discordanti.

Il corpo dei dati relativi alle osservazioni astronomiche era già imponente mille anni or sono, eppure essi erano interpretati da una teoria geocentrica: solo con Kepler iniziò ad essere generalmente accettata la teoria eliocentrica.

E quante volte ad una nostra azione pensata e ben ponderata è conseguito un effetto totalmente opposto: un complimento inteso come una offesa, per esempio.

*

Ma il fenomeno diventa ancor più manifesto quando alla pura razionalità si frammischiamo sentimenti ovvero idee preconcette. Se i teoremi di Gödel sono veri in campo scientifico, ancor più evidenziano la loro aderenza alla realtà nell’agire umano.

Perché codesti discorsi, per alcuni magari alquanto noiosi?

L’argomento è elicitato da un recente articolo edito sul Deutsche Welle, di fatto il giornale del Governo tedesco, gestito in toto della socialdemocrazia tedesca, e ripreso dai media liberal a livello mondiale.

L’ideologia liberal e socialista postula che l’aborto sia un ‘diritto fondamentale‘ della femmina. Una donna gravida avrebbe di conseguenza l’arbitrio di sopprimere il prodotto del concepimento, tra l’altro senza dover consultare il proprio partner.

Questa teoria al momento sta andando per la maggiore in Occidente, ossia tra un sesto degli abitanti del mondo, e trova esplicazione legislativa laddove i liberal o i socialisti siano al potere. Chi abbia il potere può materialmente fare ciò che vuole. Che poi questo operato sia etico o morale è tutt’altra cosa.

*

Tratto caratteristico dei liberal e dei socialisti è il ritenere che le proprie ideologie siano quelle giuste e logiche. Questo sarebbe alla fine ancora il meno, se non si ritenessero in dovere di etichettare come “anti democratici” e via quant’altro i sistemi politici che non condividono il loro punto di vista. Arrivano infine al punto di cercare in ogni modo e maniera di esercitare pressioni dall’interno affinché esse siano recepite: in parole povere cercano di imporle anche la dove non esercitano.

Noi ammettiamo francamente di essere affezzionati al sistema elettivo del governo: se i liberal ed i socialisti vogliono imporre la loro visione come leggi organiche, ebbene, vincano le elezioni. Ma nelle ultime elezioni in Polonia essi non sono riusciti a far eleggere nemmeno un deputato che fosse uno. Nemmeno per sbaglio. Che si credano, e vogliano far credere, che siano la maggioranza è una pacchiana menzogna.

In questo lavorio si avvalgono a piene mani dell’opera di ngo, ogn, ospitate negli stati loro obiettivi. Non a caso definiscono ‘anti democratici‘ quei governi che limitano e regolamentano la presenze delle ngo sui loro territori.

*

Nel caso particolare vediamo alcuni titoli di testate liberal.

Polish Women Protest Proposed Abortion Ban (Again) [The New York Times]

«Some 200 nongovernmental organizations joined in writing a public appeal to Polish lawmakers, saying the bill would “place women’s health and lives at risk and violate Poland’s international human rights obligations.” The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has also condemned the proposed law.»

Women in Poland protest plans to tighten anti-abortion law [The Washington Post]

«Women across Poland are protesting in front of bishops’ residences after the influential Roman Catholic Church urged the government to ban abortion.

In Warsaw, 400 protesters gathered Sunday before the archbishop’s seat with wire clothes hangers, a symbol of illegal abortions. They chanted “Nothing about us without us!” and “Save the women!”»

* * *

Adesso cerchiamo di ragionare, nei limiti del possibile.

Il termine “Polish women“, “Some 200 nongovernmental organizations” darebbero immediatamente la impressione che centinaia di migliaia di donne polacche siano scese in strada a dimostrare. Magari anche milioni.

Poi, candidamente, il The Washington Post riporta che le femmine in piazza erano “400 protesters“.

Ma in un paese di circa trentotto milioni di abitanti, quattrocento persone in piazza non son certo la totalità della popolazione.

Le titolazioni di questi due giornali sono fuorvianti il Lettore. Sono grottesche.

Ma altrettanto grottesche sono le affermazioni del Deutsche Welle.

«The nationwide demonstrations, drawing thousands to the streets»

*

«Hundreds»

Ragioniamo: le migliaia di donne erano centinaia: differenza di tre ordine di grandezza.

* * * * * * *

Non si vuole entrare qui nell’argomento che ogni governo liberamente eletto dovrebbe essere libero di legiferare secondo convenienza. Né, tanto meno, sulla eticità e moralità dell’aborto.

Tanto meno si vorrebbe trattare di istituzioni che si arrogano il diritto di giudizio in casa altrui, pur essendo autoreferenziali.

Si vorrebbe invece far notare come il riportare le notizie in modo così platealmente distorto sia alla fine del tutto controproducente.

La testata perde la credibilità: la si legge al massimo per sapere come la pensano i liberal, non certo per acquisire notizie veritiere ed accertate.

Il risultato finale è semplicissimo.

In accordo al principio della eterogenesi dei fini, questa pressante propaganda liberal risulta essere non solo controproducente, ma sconfina rapidamente nel ridicolo. Ed essere definiti ridicoli è forse la peggiore delle constatazioni possibili.

Poi, in Germania la socialdemocrazia ha raccolto circa il 20% dei suffragi e le intenzioni di voto sono al momento in discesa: parlino quindi per sé stessi e non a nome di tutti i tedeschi.

Non si sottovaluti il grandioso contributo che i media liberal hanno dato al successo di Alternative für Deutschland in Germania e dei partiti ‘populisti‘ in tutte Europa.

Chi legga i loro mezzi di comunicazione di massa sa che è vero l’esatto opposto di quanto riportato.

Se non fosse, si direbbe quasi che le testate citate siano al soldo dei ‘populisti’. E forse non si sbaglierebbe di tanto.


Deutsche Welle. 2018-03-25. Thousands in Poland protest stricter abortion laws

The country already has some of Europe’s most restrictive abortion laws, but the ruling PiS party wants to tighten them further. The EU human rights head has warned this would put Poland at odds with international law.

*

“Stop tightening abortion laws,” read the red hand-shaped signs that protestors in Poland carried on Friday as they marched through the streets of Warsaw and other Polish cities to protest the ruling conservative government’s initiative to tighten the country’s already strict laws against abortion.

The nationwide demonstrations, drawing thousands to the streets, were dubbed “Black Friday,” a reference to the black attire that has often been donned by the protesters since 2016. The protests that year forced the government to abandon a plan to make all abortions illegal.

However, Poland still has some of the most stringent abortion laws in the European Union (EU). Currently, they allow abortion only in the case of risk to the mother’s life or if the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest.

Friday’s protesters spoke out in opposition to the proposed legislation changes, which would ban abortions for irreparably sick or impaired fetuses, or those with Down Syndrome.

Hundreds turned out in Wroclaw, a city in western Poland, with some carrying signs reading, “I will not give birth to a dead baby.”

Others in Warsaw held a banner stating “Women’s Strike,” the name of the organizing movement that fights a further clamp-down on abortion rights. The protesters in the capital marched through the streets chanting and blaring bullhorn sirens.

From the bishops’ seat to parliament and PiS headquarters

The march in Warsaw began at the seat of the Roman Catholic bishops, who back stricter anti-abortion laws in the strongly Catholic country. The procession then headed to parliament before ending at the headquarters of the ruling right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party headed up by Jaroslaw Kaczynski.

Last year, the PiS government launched a campaign urging Poles to “breed like rabbits” in order to raise the country’s declining birth rate. Additionally, in a program called “Family 500+,” the state pays out around 500 zloty (€118, $146) per child per month to families with two or more children.

The government has also cut funding for in-vitro fertilization.

The PiS-proposed restrictions have supporters. Stop Abortion committee activist Kaja Godek told AFP that if passed, the new rules stopping abortions of malformed fetuses would “represent the lives of three human beings every day.”

However, the Council of Europe’s human rights commissioner, Nils Muiznieks, expressed his worries about the draft law and called on the parliament to reject the proposed changes.

“Poland has one of the most restrictive abortion laws in Europe,” Muiznieks said in a statement posted to social media. “This step would be at variance with Poland’s obligations under human rights law.”

Annunci
Pubblicato in: Problemi Etici e Morali

India. Bandita dal prime time Tv la pubblicità dei preservativi.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-12-15.

ulisse che-saetta-i-proci-particolare1

L’epoca liberal si sta avviando al declino e molti popoli possono adesso iniziare a tornare alle proprie radici religiose, storiche, culturali, finalmente libere da ricatti.

India. Da paese emergente a paese emerso.

India. Ong, matrimoni e Corti di Giustizia.

Ong. Tempi durissimi. India avvia inchiesta sulla Bloomberg Philanthropies.

*

«India has slapped a nationwide ban on television ads for condoms during prime time hours, citing rules prohibiting “vulgar” content and concerns over children viewing salacious material»

*

«The information and broadcasting ministry ordered India’s estimated 900 television channels to restrict condom commercials to between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.»

*

«All TV channels are hereby advised not to telecast the advertisements of condoms which are [a] for particular age group and could be indecent for viewing by children»

*

«It also cited broadcasting regulations prohibiting “indecent, vulgar, suggestive, repulsive or offensive themes.”»

* * * * * * *

Tutte le variazioni epocali si snodano secondo i loro tempi fisiologici.

L’Occidente ha perso lo scettro di prima economia mondiale e la sua influenza politica, culturale e militare diminuisce ogni giorno che passa, in ciò favorita dalle laceranti divisioni interne. Quasi non esiste più un paese occidentale coeso, ove la maggior parte del popolo si riconosca spontaneamente in una determinata Weltanschauung.

Nel converso, l’India sta sviluppando un sistema economico in pieno ed accentuato sviluppo, e si sente sempre più libera.

In questa materia, ha ristabilito riallineato gli indirizzi giuridici delle diverse corti di giustizia, ha ripristinato le leggi dell’istituto matrimoniale, ha bloccato per non dire eliminato la presenza delle ngo (ogn) sul suo territorio, ed oggi elimina dalle ore di punta televisive la pubblicità di prodotti inadatti al grande pubblico, specie poi a bambini.

Lentamente, etica e morale tornano a rioccupare i posti dai quali erano state scacciate.


Hurriyet Daily Mirror. 2017-12-12. India bans condom ads from prime time TV

India has slapped a nationwide ban on television ads for condoms during prime time hours, citing rules prohibiting “vulgar” content and concerns over children viewing salacious material.

The information and broadcasting ministry ordered India’s estimated 900 television channels to restrict condom commercials to between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., threatening repercussions if the ads fall outside graveyard hours.

“All TV channels are hereby advised not to telecast the advertisements of condoms which are [a] for particular age group and could be indecent for viewing by children,” the order said Dec. 11.

It also cited broadcasting regulations prohibiting “indecent, vulgar, suggestive, repulsive or offensive themes.”

India’s public and private television channels beam into nearly 183 million households across the country, data from the Broadcast

Audience Research Council industry group shows.

Sex remains a taboo subject in India, a broadly conservative and traditional country, and condom ads have stirred up controversy in the past.

In September, India’s largest trading body successfully lobbied for condom billboards featuring a former porn star be pulled down in Gujarat state, citing religious sensitivities.

In lodging its protest, the trade body accused the condom manufacturer of putting “India’s cultural value at stake” by promoting contraceptives on the eve of a Hindu festival.

Pubblicato in: Economia e Produzione Industriale, Problemi Etici e Morali

Auto elettriche. Sfruttano lavoro minorile, corruzione e schiavitù. – Handelsblatt

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-11-09.

2017-11-05__auto elettriche__001

Dmitri Hvorostovsky – Elena Kuznetsova. Демон. Bol’šoj



Handelsblatt pone una serie di severi problemi, ciascuno dei quali meriterebbe una trattazione a parte.

Buona parte del mondo occidentale sembrerebbe vivere una lunga riga di illusioni, mondi fantastici ritenuti essere veri.

Ma la realtà, tutte le realtà, sono estremamente differenti. Per un qualche lasso di tempo possono essere ignorate, ma alla fine ci si sbatte contro.

«For a long time, automakers ignored the problem. All that mattered to them was the price and the quality of the materials»

*

«We are aware of the difficulties in the production of some raw materials»

*

«Environmental or social problems in raw materials production in a country far away can now make it into the newspapers here in a matter of hours»

*

«German companies share responsibility for this»

*

«South African workers are putting their own health at risk to keep Germans healthy»

*

«German chemicals group BASF is one of the most important importers and uses the platinum to coat catalytic converters, which are then installed into German cars»

*

«So you could say that South African workers are putting their own health at risk to keep Germans healthy and the air clean in German cities. Indirectly, you could even say that German automakers share some responsibility for the deaths and suffering of workers not just in Marikana, but in mines all over the world»

*

«The workers were being paid just €400 ($464) per month for back breaking work»

*

«The brutal reaction of the local police, who acted in coordination with British mining company Lonmin, was later described as a massacre»

*

«Cobalt is a vital component of rechargeable batteries for e-cars. It is thought that around 40,000 children are engaged in its extraction in Congo»

* * *

«An average German car weighs around 1,300 kilos, of which metals account for approximately one ton: steel, iron, aluminum, copper and tiny quantities of platinum. Electric cars don’t have heavy metal parts like the combustion engine but they use hundreds of kilos of raw materials for the batteries: lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel and manganese»

*

«The makers of smartphones have been pilloried for years for using metals that have been mined in appalling conditions»

*

«The area, in inner Mongolia, produces around 66 percent of the world’s graphite, an important ingredient in the lithium-ion batteries that will power a new generation of electric cars. There are 54 kilos in a Tesla Model S electric car alone»

* * * * * * * *

Cerchiamo di enucleare i principali aspetti, pur consci di tralasciarne molti anche importanti.

– Non esiste una qualche produzione di beni che non costi immani fatiche, lacrime e sangue. E questo è particolarmente vero per le materie prime, specie quelle estrattive.

– Volenti o nolenti, i rapporti benefici / costi guidano l’agire economico, in una rete complessa di equilibri labili e precari. Nessuno può presumere di poter vivere di rendita, specie in un contesto commerciale caratterizzato dalla facilità dei trasporti. Chi non si adegui, scompare rapidamente dalla scena: muore dapprima economicamente, quindi fisicamente.

– La collettività, l’enclave socio – economico che abbia raggiunto una qualche prosperità tende inevitabilmente ad abbandonare lavori particolarmente faticosi o pericolosi, delegandoli ad altri. Nell’antichità si era formata una classe legalizzata di padrone ed una di schiavi. Ma la struttura dei rapporti non cambia de facto ai nostri tempi: i miseri si devono accontentare di quanto la situazione consente loro. È un mero prendere o lasciare. Sopravvivere o morire.

– Queste situazioni ben si prestano a comportamenti ipocriti. Gli occidentali inneggiano la loro ricchezza, mica sudata peraltro ma ereditata dai propri padri, ambiscono a godere ogni possibile tipo di lusso e vorrebbero vivere ‘ecologicamente puliti’. Ambizioni comprensibili, solo che delegano altrui tutte le cose ‘sporche‘. Per un occidentale che sale in macchina e parla al telefonino ci sono state decine di persone sfruttate fino alle midolla.

* * * * * * *

Se si potesse cercare di evitare l’odiosa ipocrisia, si dovrebbero ammettere alcune verità.

– Se è vero che in Congo migliaia di bambini lavorano in condizioni per noi al limite della tollerabilità umana, è anche vero che devono benedire il Cielo che vi siano le miniere, ancorché remunerate al minimo vitale: senza di quelle sarebbero già morti di fame.

– Rinunciare alla produzione, delegandola altrove, porta inevitabilmente nel tempo alla disassuefazione mentre i produttori crescono: alla fine gli equilibri si capovolgono. Nel conseguente turmoil accadono di norma i regolamenti dei conti sospesi. Non ci si illuda.

* * * * * * *

Da molto fastidio, davvero molto, l’ipocrisia che gronda dal discorso dell’Handelsblatt.

Chiunque consumi energia dovrebbe ben sapere che da qualche parte è stata prodotta. Da qualche parte si è ‘inquinato‘.

Chiunque mangi un pane, dovrebbe ben sapere che da qualche parte nel mondo il grano è stato seminato, mietuto, trebbiato, farinato, impastato e quindi infornato.

L’Handelsblatt vuole essere credibile?

Bene. Si faccia parte attiva, anche economicamente, per una più congrua remunerazione delle materie prime.

Smetta di fingere di sdegnarsi per una mano che accarezza una coscia e si sdegni veramente per la mano che uccide.

* * * * * * *

Chi non si ricorda Il Demone, Демон, di Michail Lermontov musicato ad arte dal grande Anton Rubinstein?

Il bacio del demone uccide, ma questi resta pur sempre solo con il suo orgoglio, senza amore.


Handelsblatt. 2017-11-03. The German Auto Industry’s Darkest Secrets

German consumers purchasing a new electric car may be buying a few extras they didn’t reckon with – such as child labor, corruption and police brutality.

*

The young man shyly moves his T-shirt down over his belly, hiding the scars from the operation and the exit holes. His fellow South Africans call Mzoxolo Magidiwana, 24, “dead man walking” because he will never recover from the injuries he suffered when police opened fire on him and his fellow workers five years ago. Bullets tore into his stomach and his right arm no longer has any strength; nor can he walk properly anymore.

Mr. Magidiwana was one of the leaders of the 3,000 miners who went on strike on August 12, 2012 to protest poor working conditions and low pay at the Marikana platinum mine some 100 kilometers from Johannesburg in South Africa. The workers were being paid just €400 ($464) per month for back breaking work. Below ground, they had to contend with constant accidents and dust that made them ill. Above ground, they were breathing the toxic fumes coming out of the platinum smelter.

The brutal reaction of the local police, who acted in coordination with British mining company Lonmin, was later described as a massacre. They fired 400 rounds into the crowd, killing 37 workers and injuring scores more.

And, as Mr. Magidiwana says now, “German companies share responsibility for this.” He was referring to German automakers that, like companies from other countries, buy platinum from Marikana.

«South African workers are putting their own health at risk to keep Germans healthy.»

Lonmin supplies Western manufacturers with the metal. German chemicals group BASF is one of the most important importers and uses the platinum to coat catalytic converters, which are then installed into German cars.

So you could say that South African workers are putting their own health at risk to keep Germans healthy and the air clean in German cities. Indirectly, you could even say that German automakers share some responsibility for the deaths and suffering of workers not just in Marikana, but in mines all over the world. This is also true of other firms that process mined raw materials, such as cellphone makers Apple and Samsung.

In Congo, thousands of children mine for cobalt. In China, pollution from graphite mining affects workers and inhabitants. In Peru, protests by copper mine workers have turned violent. The products of all of these mines end up in German cars.

For a long time, automakers ignored the problem. All that mattered to them was the price and the quality of the materials. But in recent years, they’ve become more aware of their responsibilities in the matter. Roused by shocking reports of human rights abuses and rattled by the VW diesel emissions scandal, auto industry managers have set about checking up on their procurement procedures and trying to find solutions.

Daimler, BMW and VW don’t deny that there’s a problem in the supply chain and that they’ve got to face up to it.

BMW has been working on the issue since 2012, with the aim to make the supply chain’s provenance as transparent as possible. The car maker has almost achieved that with its steel supplies and has identified 30 raw materials whose provenance it wants more transparency on.

“Breaches of human rights or trespasses against environmental protection don’t fit with our principles or with the premium standards of our products and they could result in customers spurning our cars,” Ferdinand Geckeler, BMW’s sustainability manager, explains.

Mr. Geckeler says BMW has a traffic light system for raw materials without certified provenance. An external agency monitors BMW’s supply chains, assesses dealers, mining companies and countries of origin and then assigns colors. Materials marked green can be purchased without qualms. Yellow indicates that purchases are made on condition that standards are improved. Products marked red are shunned.

“Our goal is to have 95 percent of our suppliers on a green light. But 1 to 3 percent are still red,” says Mr. Geckeler. There is an acknowledgement that the supply chain will never be risk free.

The scandal over emissions-cheating software in VW diesel engines has alerted automakers to the risks of bad publicity.

“Environmental or social problems in raw materials production in a country far away can now make it into the newspapers here in a matter of hours,” Horst Wildemann, an economics professor and specialist in automotive logistics at Munich’s Technical University, notes. “Company bosses are really scared of something like that. The diesel scandal has shown them that public sentiment can endanger entire business divisions.”

An average German car weighs around 1,300 kilos, of which metals account for approximately one ton: steel, iron, aluminum, copper and tiny quantities of platinum. Electric cars don’t have heavy metal parts like the combustion engine but they use hundreds of kilos of raw materials for the batteries: lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel and manganese.

The makers of smartphones have been pilloried for years for using metals that have been mined in appalling conditions. But the quantities used by Apple or Samsung are tiny by comparison with VW or Daimler. A single car contains as much metal as some 30,000 phones. Automakers flood the street with 60 million new cars ever year – that’s 60 billion kilos of metal or 1,800 billion smartphones.

If the automakers insisted, mining companies could offer raw materials produced in fair conditions. And experts estimate that such an approach would boost the price of a new car by some €200 at most. But that’s still too much for some German automakers, who are making more profit than ever before.

BMW appears to be ahead of German rivals in its attempts to monitor suppliers. Daimler has said that, given the complexity of supply chains, “a precise proof of origin is barely possible, even with a large degree of effort.”

«Germany has a special role: The rules must come from the countries where multinational companies are based.»

“We are aware of the difficulties in the production of some raw materials,” was all VW had to say on the matter.

A brief visit to Liumao, China, home to one of the largest graphite mines in the world demonstrates just how difficult. The area, in inner Mongolia, produces around 66 percent of the world’s graphite, an important ingredient in the lithium-ion batteries that will power a new generation of electric cars. There are 54 kilos in a Tesla Model S electric car alone.

But the people in Liumao are paying dearly for Europeans’ desire for less polluting traffic. Workers spend eight hours a day in a darkened room with no air conditioning and insufficient protective gear, the factory run-off seeps into local waterways and poisons local crops.

Working backwards along German auto makers’ supply chains, one finds a Chinese firm called BTS, that supplies battery producers, Samsung SDI and LG Chem. A spokesperson for Samsung concedes there are environmentally damaging mines in the area but says that BTS doesn’t get graphite from them. BMW says they don’t think they are using graphite from those mines but can’t completely rule it out. Daimler and VW did not answer questions about this aspect of their supply chain. And BTS itself did not respond to enquiries.

There is no law forcing German companies to ensure that their suppliers meet social and environmental standards. That is in contrast to other European countries. This year France passed legislation requiring companies to provide information on their supply chains. The Dutch have introduced rules banning child labor from company suppliers and the British have made the most progress, with a 2015 law forcing all companies with revenue above 36 million pounds (€40.6 million) to provide annual information on whether human rights are being observed along their supply chain.

The United Nations is working on a binding agreement to try to rule out human rights abuses along the supply chain. The project was initiated by supplier nations like South Africa but it will have to be implemented by the West, and that’s where the problem lies.

« Cobalt is a vital component of rechargeable batteries for e-cars. It is thought that around 40,000 children are engaged in its extraction in Congo.»

Germany will introduce a rule requiring firms to state whether they’re living up to their social responsibility, but only from 2021 onwards and only for firms employing more than 500 people. A supply chain vetting process will also be introduced but only for some companies and not until 2020. So far the German government has managed to come up with a wish list but any more stringent regulations, such as those wanted by the German foreign office, have been watered down so as not to weigh too heavily on German corporates.

Auto makers themselves have said that if regulations are to be introduced they should be wide ranging, so as not to damage their own competiveness.

“If anything the EU and Germany have torpedoed the process so far,” argues Michael Reckrodt, of Arbeitskreis Rohstoffe – translated that means “working group for raw materials” – a German NGO that advocates for fair raw materials. Mr. Reckrodt says he is skeptical that things would change at all under Chancellor Angela Merkel’s new government.

After all, Ms. Merkel hasn’t done much on that score in her last 12 years in power. “But Germany has a special role: The rules must come from the countries where multinational companies are based,” says Mr. Reckrodt, even as he acknowledges that the process will take years.

Companies using raw materials with dubious provenance have their own ways of trying to improve things. A common strategy involves not cancelling contracts with slightly dubious suppliers, instead putting commercial pressure on them to change their ways.

For example, Hamburg company Aurubis produces more than a million copper cathodes every year that end up in German cars. And the firm makes clear demands on suppliers when it comes to human rights and working conditions. But, as the company also explains, when there are infringements there’s not much they can do to pressure the mining companies because they use less than 4 percent of the global supply of copper concentrate. If Aurubis broke off their contract, then the copper would just go to other manufacturers who don’t make the same demands, they conclude.

Another supply chain issue has come out of the hype around electric cars. Over the last 12 months, the price of cobalt has doubled to more than $60,000 a ton because it is a vital component of rechargeable batteries. Congo is one of the biggest suppliers of cobalt and it is thought that around 40,000 children are engaged in its extraction.

A Chinese company, Huayou, is one of the biggest sellers of cobalt and one of their managers reports that the company is doing its best to proof suppliers and avoid child labor. Huayou is doing something but, as the manager then admits, they cannot guarantee that all of their cobalt is completely free of child labor.

German chemicals giant BASF says it doesn’t want to cut ties with Lonmin, the company that South African miners were protesting against at the Marikana platinum mine. Instead BASF is setting certain standards that Lonmin must adhere to. If the mining company doesn’t improve, “we reserve the right to terminate the cooperation,” a statement from BASF says.

Lonmin has apologized for the massacre, built homes and set aside 30 million pounds ($39.5 million) to improve working conditions. Wages have been increased and BASF has undertaken audits and paid for a fire brigade at the plant. Still, the workers continue to do eight-hour shifts underground, unable to stand up and without any breathing equipment. Water is used to keep the dust down.

Ask the South African miners here whether anything has improved and they say the drills are quieter now.

Ask them what gives them pleasure and they have only one answer: Pay day.

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Problemi Etici e Morali

Trump. Starebbe per firmare un Executive Order presenti 100 personalità.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-05-04.

Reni Guido. San Michele Arcangelo schiaccia satana. 1636

«President Trump has invited about 100 conservative leaders to the White House on Thursday, when he’s expected to sign an executive order on religious liberty»

*

«Mr. Trump will be holding an event for the National Day of Prayer»

*

«Mr. Trump will likely sign what one conservative leader described as a “very strong” order to promote religious freedom»

* * *

«ACLU calls possible action anti-gay discrimination»

Cosa è l’Aclu?

«L’American Civil Liberties Union (Unione Americana per le Libertà Civili, sigla ACLU) è un’organizzazione non governativa orientata a difendere i diritti civili e le libertà individuali negli Stati Uniti.

Le cause legali intentate dall’ACLU hanno avuto un ruolo importante in molte delle evoluzioni del diritto costituzionale degli Stati Uniti. L’ACLU procura avvocati e consigli legali per casi in cui a suo parere sono violati i diritti civili e le libertà individuali. In molti casi in cui non fornisce rappresentanti legali, l’ACLU prepara documenti legali di appello in sostegno alle sue posizioni (i cosiddetti amicus curiae). Negli anni recenti, l’ACLU ha ricevuto critiche e accuse di essere schierata con la sinistra politica.» [Fonte]

*

Cosa vuole l’Aclu?

«Opposizione all’esibizione autorizzata dal governo di simboli religiosi in spazi pubblici;

Opposizione a preghiere ufficiali, cerimonie religiose, o “momenti di silenzio” in scuole pubbliche o scuole finanziate con fondi statali;

Sostegno per la piena applicazione dei diritti garantiti dal Primo emendamento per la stampa, incluse le pubblicazioni scolastiche;

Sostegno per la legalità dell’aborto sulla base di un diritto alla privacy implicito nel Quarto emendamento;

Sostegno ai pieni diritti civili per gli omosessuali, inclusi i benefici statali per le coppie omosessuali pari a quelli accordati alle coppie eterosessuali;

Sostegno per l’affirmative action;

Sostegno ai diritti degli imputati e degli accusati contro atti incostituzionali e l’uso eccessivo della forza da parte della polizia;

Opposizione alla criminalizzazione delle droghe, e supporto per la legalizzazione di droghe come eroina, cocaina e marijuana;

Opposizione alla circolazione libera delle armi da fuoco;» [Fonte]

*

Chi patrocina e finanzia l’Aclu?

Mr George Soros.


The Washington Times. 2017-05-03. Trump invites conservatives to White House, reportedly to sign religious-liberty order

ACLU calls possible action anti-gay discrimination, vows to sue if true

*

President Trump has invited about 100 conservative leaders to the White House on Thursday, when he’s expected to sign an executive order on religious liberty.

Mr. Trump will be holding an event for the National Day of Prayer, White House deputy press secretary Sarah Sanders confirmed. But she said there was no announcement to be made about a possible executive order.

A report by Politico said Mr. Trump will likely sign what one conservative leader described as a “very strong” order to promote religious freedom. A draft order that circulated in February would have established religious exemptions for businesses and individuals.

Vice President Mike Pence and his team reportedly have been pushing for a revised order after the initial draft was criticized by gay-rights advocates.

The ACLU said in a statement it will sue the administration if Mr. Trump “attempts to provide a license to discriminate against women or LGBT people.”

In addition to the National Day of Prayer, Thursday is also the annual Canterbury Medal Gala hosted by the Becket Fund, a group that advocates for religious freedom. This year’s honoree is conservative legal activist Leonard Leo, whom Mr. Trump has praised for helping him to develop a list of conservative candidates for nomination to the Supreme Court.

“Leonard Leo is a lionhearted defender of law and freedom. His dedication to religious liberty is profoundly important to our country and for religious believers worldwide,” said Bill Mumma, president of Becket.

Pubblicato in: Persona Umana, Problemi Etici e Morali

Trump. Cade la prima testa di una anchorwoman pro-choice.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-03-22.

Neonato 001

Durante l’Amministrazione Obama chiunque si fosse dichiarato “pro-life” sarebbe stato licenziato in tronco, specie poi se avesse esercitato una qualche funzione pubblica, come, per esempio, anchorwoman.

Ma dal venti gennaio è entrato in carica il Presidente Trump, ed il mondo si adegua.

*

«On Friday’s episode of “The View,” she told the audience she was pro-choice.» [Fonte]

*

«Even Hillary Clinton didn’t call pro-life conservatives hypocrites»

*

«US conservative political commentator Tomi Lahren has reportedly been suspended from her talk show»

*

Pro-choise è una ideologia in accordo alla quale la madre dovrebbe avere la potestà legale di abortire senza alcuna limitazione.

*

Prendiamo atto del fatto che per la prima volta da otto anni a questa parte una femmina pro-choise, che per di più lavorava quale anchorwoman, sia stata sospesa dal lavoro.


Bbc. 2017-03-21. US TV host Tomi Lahren ‘suspended over pro-choice comments’

US conservative political commentator Tomi Lahren has reportedly been suspended from her talk show after saying she holds pro-choice views on abortion.

*

The 24-year-old pundit hosts Tomi on the conservative US network TheBlaze.

She rose to prominence during the 2016 US election for her provocative and energetic online political monologues.

Ms Lahren has faced a huge online backlash since speaking on ABC’s The View last week.

Ms Lahren said: “I’m someone that is for limited government, so I can’t sit here and be a hypocrite and say I’m for limited government, but I think that the government should decide what women do with their bodies.

“Stay out of my guns, and you can stay out of my body as well.”

Anti-abortion views are seen as fundamental to the US Republican Party platform and conservative political views in the US.

Ms Lahren has since defended her comments on Twitter, saying: “I speak my truth. If you don’t like it, tough.”

Reports suggest her show may now be cut altogether, amid rising tensions between Ms Lahren and other Blaze employees and hosts.

The network’s founder, Glenn Beck, has spoken out against Ms Lahren, and another reporter, Kaitlyn Schallhorn, tweeted: “Even Hillary Clinton didn’t call pro-life conservatives hypocrites.”

Mr Beck also criticised Ms Lahren’s declaration that she had libertarian – as well as conservative – views, which he said did not tally with those of President Trump.

The conservative network describes itself as “a platform for a new generation of authentic and unfiltered voices”.

Ms Lahren has 4.3 million followers on her Facebook page.


BuzzFeedNews. 2017-03-21. Tomi Lahren Has Reportedly Been Suspended From Her Show After Admitting She’s Pro-Choice

Conservative talk show host Tomi Lahren has reportedly been suspended from her show on The Blaze, after her recent admission she supports abortion rights caused controversy with fans.

Lahren, who has gained viral fame for her inflammatory remarks about millennials, liberals, and others, has been suspended for a week, the Daily Caller reported.