Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente

Svezia. Il caso di Mr Qaisar Mahmood. Farsa nella tragedia.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2018-02-20.

Rullo-compressore 001

«that marks the end of Sweden’s national heritage»


«Qaisar Mahmood, född 16 februari 1973 i Lahore, Pakistan, är en svensk författare.

Qaisar Mahmood växte upp i Lahore tillsammans med sin mor och syster, medan hans far sedan några år tillbaka bodde i Sverige som arbetskraftsinvandrare. När Qaisar Mahmood var sju år gammal följde resten av familjen efter fadern och de bosatte sig i Tensta i Stockholm.

Mahmood är utbildad socionom och tog pol.mag-examen i statskunskap vid Stockholms universitet år 1999. Han var huvudsekreterare i den integrationspolitiska kommitté som den borgerliga regeringen lade ned när den tillträdde 2006. Qaisar Mahmood har arbetat på Riksrevisionen, Svenska Kommunförbundet, Regeringskansliet och Integrationsverket. Han är numera (2017) anställd som avdelningschef på Riksantikvarieämbetet.

År 2012 utkom han med boken Jakten på svenskheten (Natur & Kultur), där han skildrar en resa om 900 mil på motorcykel genom Sverige för att söka svenskheten och den svenska identiteten.» [Fonte]

*

«Qaisar Mahmood, nato il 16 febbraio 1973 a Lahore, in Pakistan, è uno scrittore svedese. Qaisar Mahmood è cresciuto a Lahore con sua madre e sua sorella, mentre suo padre ha vissuto in Svezia per alcuni anni come immigrato. Quando Qaisar Mahmood aveva sette anni, il resto della famiglia seguì il padre e si stabilirono a Tensta, a Stoccolma.
Mahmood è stato educato e si è laureato in Scienze Politiche all’Università di Stoccolma nel 1999. Era il Segretario Generale del Comitato per la politica di integrazione che il governo borghese ha messo da parte al suo insediamento nel 2006. Qaisar Mahmood ha lavorato presso l’Ufficio del Revisore Generale, il governo locale svedese, gli uffici governativi e il Consiglio di integrazione svedese. Attualmente è (2017) impiegato come Capo Dipartimento della Riksantikvarieämbetet.
Nel 2012 ha pubblicato il libro Hunting for Swedish (Nature & Culture), che descrive un viaggio di 900 miglia in motociclette attraverso la Svezia per cercare l’identità svedese»

* * *

«that marks the end of Sweden’s national heritage»

*

«Qaisar Mahmood, a Muslim born in Pakistan, is the new head of the Swedish National Heritage Board»

*

«he readily admits that he has not read anything about Sweden’s cultural heritage»

*

«is using his position as head of the Swedish National Heritage Board not to highlight and celebrate that heritage, but to downplay Sweden’s cultural heritage and history, and to create a false narrative that will help compel Swedes to accept mass Muslim migration»

*

«He says he doesn’t want simply to alert people to Viking artifacts and the like, but to use Sweden’s history to “create the narrative” that will make Muslim migrants “part of something.”»

* * * * * * * *

Queste sono le tesi che arditamente sostiene Mr Qaisar Mahmood.

«The idea had entered, however dimly, the popular consciousness: the Vikings were really Muslims. Islam is Swedish. Sweden was Islamic before it was Christian. The Muslim migrants are Swedes»

* * * * * * * *

Ricapitoliamo.

Nessuna preclusione mentale al fatto che il capo del National Heritage Board svedese possa essere un pakistano.

Esattamente come non esiste preclusione al fatto che sia un integralista islamico.

Fa specie che Mr Qaisar Mahmood sostenga tesi difficilmente compatibili con la carica ricoperta e con la documentazione storica disponibile. Invece che tutelare l’eredità nazionale la vuole semplicemente rimuovere alla radice.

«Vikings were really Muslims»

*

«Islam is Swedish»

*

«Sweden was Islamic before it was Christian»

*

Aspettiamo con pazienza i risultati delle prossime elezioni politiche. I governi nominano, ma anche destituiscono.

Ribadiamo qui un concetto già ripetutamente espresso.

Il problema non sono gli islamici, bensì la classe politica occidentale che li usa per conseguire e mantenere il potere politico, per snaturare ciò che era ed è il retaggio religioso, storico, culturale, sociale ed artistico occidentale.

Tra qualche mese gli Elettori svedesi andranno alle urne e staremo a vedere il risultato.


Frontpage Mag. 2018-02-15. Sweden Appoints Pakistani Muslim Head of National Heritage Board

And that marks the end of Sweden’s national heritage.

*

Qaisar Mahmood, a Muslim born in Pakistan, is the new head of the Swedish National Heritage Board. This is an extremely anomalous appointment, since he readily admits that he has not read anything about Sweden’s cultural heritage. But his new job is not really about preserving and protecting Sweden’s cultural heritage and historical sites at all.

Qaisar Mahmood, who once rode his motorcycle around Sweden in an apparently failed attempt to discover what being Swedish consisted of, is using his position as head of the Swedish National Heritage Board not to highlight and celebrate that heritage, but to downplay Sweden’s cultural heritage and history, and to create a false narrative that will help compel Swedes to accept mass Muslim migration. He says he doesn’t want simply to alert people to Viking artifacts and the like, but to use Sweden’s history to “create the narrative” that will make Muslim migrants “part of something.”

We have already seen how that works. Remember the fake news story about the Viking burial cloth bearing the word “Allah”? Last October, a Swedish researcher gained international headlines by claiming that burial costumes from Viking graves dating back to the ninth and tenth centuries had been found to be inscribed with the name “Allah.” The intent of this was obvious: to convince Swedes that Islam had always been a part of Sweden, all the way back to the days of the Vikings, and so they should not be concerned about the mass Muslim migration that was now bringing Sweden unprecedented rape and other crime rates. Islam has always been a part of Sweden! Stop opposing mass Muslim migration!

The Viking burial cloths didn’t really feature the name “Allah” at all, as Stephennie Mulder, an associate professor of Medieval Islamic art and archaeology at the University of Texas at Austin, proved shortly thereafter, but by then the damage had been done. The idea had entered, however dimly, the popular consciousness: the Vikings were really Muslims. Islam is Swedish. Sweden was Islamic before it was Christian. The Muslim migrants are Swedes.

The “Allah” Viking burial cloth propaganda offensive was one manifestation of what Qaisar Mahmood and others like him are doing. There is no Muslim history in Sweden, but Qaisar Mahmood is working to change the very idea of cultural heritage and fabricate fictions about a historical Muslim presence in Sweden in order to advance his political and sociological agenda.

Qaisar Mahmood, as a Pakistani, of course has no Swedish heritage of his own. His admitted lack of knowledge of Swedish heritage and history ought to have disqualified him from his position, but this is how Sweden is obliterating itself and committing cultural and national suicide. After all, Swedes appointed Qaisar Mahmood to this position. It is Swedish leaders who want to destroy Swedish cultural and national identity.

It also must be remembered in connection with Qaisar Mahmood’s role as head of the Swedish National Heritage Board that the Qur’an suggests that ruins are a sign of Allah’s punishment of those who rejected his truth: “Many were the Ways of Life that have passed away before you: travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who rejected Truth.” (3:137)

This is one of the foundations of the Islamic idea that pre-Islamic civilizations, and non-Islamic civilizations, are all jahiliyya — the society of unbelievers, which is worthless. Obviously this cuts against the idea of tourism of ancient sites and non-Muslim religious installations such as are found all over Sweden.

  1. S. Naipaul encountered this attitude in his travels through Muslim countries. For many Muslims, he observed in Among the Believers, “The time before Islam is a time of blackness: that is part of Muslim theology. History has to serve theology.” Naipaul recounted that some Pakistani Muslims, far from valuing the nation’s renowned archaeological site at Mohenjo Daro, saw its ruins as a teaching opportunity for Islam, recommending that Qur’an 3:137 be posted there as a teaching tool.

It does lead one to ponder what Qaisar Mahmood might allow to be done, or not done, with Sweden’s historical sites and artifacts. But whatever destruction may ensue is, obviously, what Swedish authorities want.


Basler Zeitung. 2018-02-15. Armes, dummes Schweden

Die schwedische Regierung leugnet das krachende Scheitern der Integration. In Städten bildeten sich unterdessen rechtsfreie No-Go-Zonen.

*

Aus Schweden stammen Ikea, Abba und Pippi Langstrumpf, auf der ganzen Welt geliebte Brands. Ebenso erfolgreich, wäre es nur nach dem Willen der Erfinder gegangen, hätte auch eine andere schwedische Idee werden sollen: die Öffnung des «Folkhemmet», des sozialdemokratischen Wohlfahrtsmodells «Volksheim» für Geflüchtete und Beladene aus der ganzen Welt. Das kulturell homogene Schweden sollte multikulturell werden, hatte vor rund vierzig Jahren dessen politische Elite beschlossen, und die Grenzen weit geöffnet.

Die dankbaren Neubürger würden bald die Tugenden der wackeren, arbeitsamen und etwas langweiligen Nordländer übernehmen, und Schweden würde als «humanitäre Grossmacht» und Modell einer ethnisch-religiös kunterbunten, aber trotzdem friedlichen und fürsorglichen Gesellschaft den restlichen Nationen den Weg leuchten. So die Träume der stolzen Sozialingenieure. Es kam anders.

Multikulturelles Nirwana

In Städten bildeten sich rechtsfreie No-Go-Zonen, wo sich Migranten-Gangs mit automatischen Waffen und Handgranaten bekriegen. Gewaltkriminalität, auch islamisch motivierte, nimmt kontinuierlich zu, besonders stark aber sexuelle Gewalt und mit ihr der Tatbestand der Gruppenvergewaltigung. Migranten der ersten und zweiten Generation, insbesondere aus Nordafrika und Nahost, sind in allen Sparten überproportional vertreten.

Das polit-mediale Establishment leugnet das krachende Scheitern der Integration und verfolgt unbeirrbar ihr quasi-religiöses Projekt eines postnationalen, postreligiösen, multikulturellen Nirwanas. Wie ernst man es meint, zeigt eine jüngste Personalie. Zum neuen Direktor von Schwedens Nationalem Amt für Kulturerbe wurde der 44-jährige Muslim Qaisar Mahmood gewählt. Der gebürtige Pakistani ist jetzt oberster Verantwortlicher für die Erhaltung von Schwedens historischer Seele: von Wikinger-Gräbern, Runen, mittelalterlichen Kirchen, Volkstrachten. Mahmood hat Soziologie studiert, war Integrationsbeamter, schrieb Aufsätze über «Diversität», hat aber, wie er sagt, noch nie ein Buch über Archäologie oder Kulturerbe gelesen.

Wer einen solchen Personalentscheid anordnet oder zulässt, hat eine kulturelle Todessehnsucht. Armes, dummes Schweden.

 

Annunci
Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Religioni, Unione Europea

Europa. Make Islam Great Again.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2018-02-09.

 Mecca 001

Il Gatestone Institute ha recentemente pubblicato un interessante report ben supportato da dati numerici.

Europe: Making Islam Great Again.

*

«In Germany, 47% of Muslims believe Sharia is more important than German law.»

*

«In Sweden, 52% of Muslims believe that Sharia is more important than Swedish law.»

*

«two-thirds of Belgians feel that their nation is being “increasingly invaded”.»

*

«two-thirds of the asylum seekers are men, mostly under 30 years old. They are all in favor of preserving their traditional, conservative, Islamic values. The migrants are extremely religious; 70% go to the mosque every Friday for prayers.»

*

«The women are just as religious, if not more: 62.6% pray five times a day, notably more than the men (39.7%).»

*

«66.3% of the women wear a headscarf in public, and 44.3% refuse to shake hands with a man»

*

«Half of the migrants (49.8%), report that religion now plays a larger role in their daily lives in Europe, than it did in their native country. 47.2% are convinced that Jews and Christians have strayed from the “right path”, and 47.8% think that the future of Islam would be in danger if Islam were to be interpreted in a modern and contemporary fashion»

*

«For 51.6% of the interviewees, the supremacy of Islam over other religions is undisputed. 55% believe in hell for unbelievers.»

*

«The migrants are not only intolerant of other religions: 50% find that homosexuality is a punishable sin. 44% of respondents said they would endorse violence against a woman if she cheated on her husband. 43% also said that fathers have a right to use violence on children if necessary.»

*

«patriarchal beliefs were widespread among the migrants interviewed»

*

«43% of British Muslims “believed that parts of the Islamic legal system should replace British law while only 22 per cent opposed the idea”. A different poll, also from 2016, found that nearly a quarter (23%) of all Muslims supported the introduction of sharia law in some areas of Britain, and 39% agreed that “wives should always obey their husbands” …. 52% of all British Muslims believe that homosexuality should be illegal.»

*

«33% said they “don’t like Western culture”, 29% said they believe the laws of Islam to be superior to Belgian law, and 34% said they “would definitely prefer a political system inspired by the Quran”.»

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Sinceramente, ci si stupisce che la gente si stupisca.

La attuale classe dirigente occidentale europea è così profondamente atea ed antireligiosa da non aver compreso che gli immigrati islamici siano invece religiosi praticanti.

Se è vero che tutte le popolazioni emigrate tendono a riunirsi attorno al retaggio religioso loro proprio quale simbolo identitario, è altrettanto vero come nel caso dell’Islam questo vincolo sia particolarmente radicato e condiviso.

Se è vero che una ragionevole civile convivenza potrebbe ben essere possibile, sarebbe altrettanto vero ammettere come una ‘integrazione‘ degli immigrati islamici in occidente apparirebbe essere altamente inverosimile, specie in tempi brevi. La Francia ha una larga quota di immigrati di religione islamica arrivati adesso alla terza generazione e tuttora non integrati nella Weltanschauung francese. Le banlieue sono un vivido esempio di quanto asserito.

L’occidente femminista sembrerebbe non sapersi rendere conto del fatto che gli islamici sono allevati nella loro religione proprio dalle femmine loro madri: le donne islamiche vogliono vivere la loro propria religione e la tramandano intatta alla loro prole.

Sono proprio le femmine islamiche coloro che insegnano ai loro figli che:

“wives should always obey their husbands …. patriarchal beliefs were widespread among the migrants …. they would definitely prefer a political system inspired by the Quran”,

così come dovrebbe essere in una famiglia normale.

Esattamente come sono proprio le madri islamiche ad insegnare ai propri figli che:

«homosexuality should be illegal … homosexuality is a punishable sin».

In conclusione, sia pure parziale, nessuno dovrebbe quindi stupirsi più di tanto che:

«Islamic legal system should replace British law»

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Gli immigrati islamici in Europa sono prevalentemente giovani ed hanno un elevato tasso di natalità, che contrasta visibilmente con il processo di denatalità degli autoctoni. Tempo qualche generazione ed i mussulmani saranno la maggioranza numerica in Europa. Il tasso di fertilità può però essere usato come una vera e propria arma.

Erdogan calls on Turkish families in Europe to have five children to protect against ‘injustices’ 

‘You Are the Future of Europe,’ Erdogan Tells Turks

Erdogan urges Turks in Europe to have 5 children.

Three children not enough, have five: Erdoğan to Turks in EU

You are the future of Europe’: Erdogan urges Turks in EU to have at least 5 kids

L’aspetto tragicamente farsesco dell’occidente è che patrocina la denatalità propria, non quella degli altri. Così si stanno estinguendo i liberal ed i socialisti, senza che poi nessuno li rimpianga più di tanto. Contenti loro, contenti tutti.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Considerazione finale.

Per comprendere il problema dell’immigrazione islamica in Europa e tutte le sue conseguenze, sarebbe necessario invertire i termini dell’enunciato. Operazione logica questa che quasi invariabilmente apre la porta a sorprese.

Il problema non sono i migranti islamici.

Il problema è la pregressa, ed in parte attuale, dirigenza politica e burocratica, massimamente i giudici nei tribunali, che li hanno fattivamente incentivati a lasciare le proprie patrie per ‘invadere‘ l’occidente europeo quasi a rimpiazzo della popolazione autoctona. E questo è stato solo il principio.

È stata la componente politica liberal e socialista ideologica a proteggere gli islamici immigrati, fornendo loro supporto politico e legale: fino a tanto che esse erano al governo delle nazioni europee l’immigrazione è prosperata rigogliosa.

Adesso che hanno perso il governo in quasi tutti i paesi europei, il fenomeno immigratorio ha significativamente rallentato e la sua tutela si è altrettanto significativamente ridotta. Al momento, quasi solo il deep state continua a tutelare gli immigrati, in gran parte a scopo di lucro.

Germania. Un immigrato illegale guadagna più del rettore. – Fotocopie

Germania. Immigrati illegali. Precisazioni degli uffici competenti.

*

Il vero problema sono le ideologie liberal e socialista e quanti ancora le sostengano.

Tolti questi dal potere reale, il problema della immigrazione islamica scompare come neve al sole.


Gatestone Institute. 2018-02-03. Europe: Making Islam Great Again

– In Germany, 47% of Muslims believe Sharia is more important than German law. In Sweden, 52% of Muslims believe that Sharia is more important than Swedish law.

– The studies are supported by European intelligence reports. In Germany, intelligence agencies warned in the early fall of 2015 that, “We are importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of society and law.”

– A recent Belgian study, in which 4,734 Belgians were polled, showed that two-thirds of Belgians feel that their nation is being “increasingly invaded”.

*

“We cannot and will never be able to stop migration”, wrote the EU’s Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship, Dimitris Avramopoulos recently. “At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly”.

Given that such people would have us believe that migration has become such a categorical and seemingly incontestable policy of the EU — “Migration is deeply intertwined with our policies on economics, trade, education and employment”, Avramapolous also wrote — it is crucial to analyze what kind of “diversity” the EU is inviting to make its home on the European continent.

Professor Ednan Aslan, Professor of Islamic Religious Education at the University of Vienna, recently interviewed a sample of 288 of the approximately 4,000 predominantly Afghan asylum seekers in the Austrian city of Graz, on behalf of the city’s integration department. Members of the department understandably wanted to know the views of the Muslim newcomers there. The results were published in a study, “Religiöse und Ethische Orientierungen von Muslimischen Flüchtlingen in Graz” (“Religious and ethical orientations of Muslim refugees in Graz”).

According to the study, two-thirds of the asylum seekers are men, mostly under 30 years old. They are all in favor of preserving their traditional, conservative, Islamic values. The migrants are extremely religious; 70% go to the mosque every Friday for prayers.

The women are just as religious, if not more: 62.6% pray five times a day, notably more than the men (39.7%). In addition, 66.3% of the women wear a headscarf in public, and 44.3% refuse to shake hands with a man.

Half of the migrants (49.8%), report that religion now plays a larger role in their daily lives in Europe, than it did in their native country. 47.2% are convinced that Jews and Christians have strayed from the “right path”, and 47.8% think that the future of Islam would be in danger if Islam were to be interpreted in a modern and contemporary fashion.

For 51.6% of the interviewees, the supremacy of Islam over other religions is undisputed. 55% believe in hell for unbelievers.

Anti-Semitism is deeply ingrained: 46% believe that Jews have “too much influence in world affairs”, and 44% believe that Judaism is harmful. 43% opine that Jews themselves are at fault for being persecuted, while 54.5% think that Jews only care about themselves.

The migrants are not only intolerant of other religions: 50% find that homosexuality is a punishable sin. 44% of respondents said they would endorse violence against a woman if she cheated on her husband. 43% also said that fathers have a right to use violence on children if necessary.

The Austrian study is not the first of its kind to show that Muslim migrants to Europe hold supremacist, anti-Semitic, and misogynistic views. In 2016, a study of nearly 800 migrants from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Eritrea in the German state of Bavaria was conducted by a German think tank, the Hanns Seidel Foundation. This study showed that patriarchal beliefs were widespread among the migrants interviewed, especially among migrants from Afghanistan and the mainly non-Muslim migrants from Eritrea, over 60% of whom believed that women should stay at home. Anti-Semitism was another major finding of the study, which showed that regardless of age and educational background, a majority of the migrants held anti-Semitic beliefs. Well over 50% of Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans said that the “Jews in the world have too much influence”.

Anti-Semitism in Germany has indeed become so widespread that Germany recently decided to appoint a special commissioner to fight it. Germany is reportedly preparing legislation that could see migrants who express anti-Semitic views deported from the country. “You Jew!” has apparently become a common insult among Muslim pupils in Berlin schools.

Other studies and polls also reveal the large degree to which Muslims in Europe value sharia law over national law:

A 2016 UK poll showed that 43% of British Muslims “believed that parts of the Islamic legal system should replace British law while only 22 per cent opposed the idea”. A different poll, also from 2016, found that nearly a quarter (23%) of all Muslims supported the introduction of sharia law in some areas of Britain, and 39% agreed that “wives should always obey their husbands”. Nearly a third (31%) thought it was acceptable for a British Muslim man to have more than one wife. According to the same poll, 52% of all British Muslims believe that homosexuality should be illegal.

According to a 2014 study of Moroccan and Turkish Muslims in Germany, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and Sweden, an average of almost 60% of the Muslims polled agreed that Muslims should return to the roots of Islam; 75% thought there is only one interpretation of the Koran possible and 65% said that Sharia is more important to them than the laws of the country in which they live. The specific numbers for Germany were that 47% of Muslims believe Sharia is more important than German law. In Sweden, 52% of Muslims believe that Sharia is more important than Swedish law.

The studies are supported by European intelligence reports. In Germany, intelligence agencies warned in the early fall of 2015 that, “We are importing Islamic extremism, Arab anti-Semitism, national and ethnic conflicts of other peoples, as well as a different understanding of society and law.” Four major German security agencies made it clear that “German security agencies… will not be in the position to solve these imported security problems and thereby the arising reactions from Germany’s population.”

In Norway, the head of the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST), Benedicte Bjørnland, said, in January 2016, that one cannot, “assume that new arrivals will automatically adapt to the norms and rules of Norwegian society.”

“Furthermore, new arrivals are not homogenous and can bring ethnic and religious strife with them… If parallel societies, radicalization and extremist environments emerge in the long run, we will have challenges as a security service.”

It is hardly surprising, then, that Europeans have begun to report that they no longer feel at home in their own countries. A recent Belgian study, in which 4,734 Belgians were polled, showed that two-thirds of Belgians feel that their nation is being “increasingly invaded”. Two thirds of the people said that there are “too many immigrants in Belgium”, while 77% agreed with the statement, “Today we no longer feel at home as we did before [mass migration]”. According to 74% of people surveyed, Islam is “not a tolerant religion”, while 60% said the presence of so many Muslims in their nation presents a threat to its identity. Only 12% said they believe the religion is “a source of enrichment” for Belgium.

The study also surveyed 400 Belgian Muslims: 33% said they “don’t like Western culture”, 29% said they believe the laws of Islam to be superior to Belgian law, and 34% said they “would definitely prefer a political system inspired by the Quran”. The study also found that 59% of Muslims in Belgium would “condemn” the marriage if their son chose a non-Muslim partner, and 54% would condemn the marriage if their daughter chose a non-Muslim partner. Tellingly, the response of the researchers behind the study — public broadcaster RTBF, liberal newspaper Le Soir, sociology research institute Survey and Action and a foundation called This is Not a Crisis — was to claim that they “observed the development of a true anti-Muslim paranoia [among Belgians], which has taken on a pathological dimension”.

None of these studies, polls, and intelligence reports appear to be making the least impression on European leaders. In the starry-eyed words of Avramapolous, it is not enough that the mainly Muslim migrants who have come to Europe, “have found safety in Europe”. According to him, “We also need to make sure they find a home”.

The question that remains unanswered — as European leaders seek to make Islam great again on the continent — is where Europeans are supposed to make their homes.

Pubblicato in: Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Medio Oriente, Persona Umana

Umoristi arabi. Una piacevole sorpresa. Chi sa sorridere è libero.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-10-09.

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__001

Sono molti gli indicatori di buona salute di una Collettività, e tra questi satira ed umorismo sono un ottimo segno.

Quando si riesce a sorridere di sé stessi e dei propri governanti si inizia a percepire una ventata di libertà.

Siamo chiari.

Uno dei segni più evidenti che un essere umano è libero consiste nel fatto che ogni tanto sappia fermarsi e praticare un approfondito esame di ciò che sta pensando e facendo: una revisione critica che lo rimetta in discussione.

Una corretta percezione della realtà è il primo passo: poi consegue l’analisi con sintesi finale, cui deve conseguire la capacità di ammettere con sé stessi “Ho sbagliato“, “posso migliorare“. Infine, quella grandiosa dote umana che è il cambiamento di idee: abbandonare senza rimpianti quanto errato od inadeguato, per assumere una nuova mentalità.

È un processo doloroso, anche molto doloroso, che richiede una intrinseca onestà mentale ed una grande dose di umiltà.

Solo un uomo maturo sa ammettere di aver sbagliato, ma solo uno onesto sa trarne le conseguenze e cambiare.

Serve una grande dose di rettitudine il sapersi assumere le proprie responsabilità.

Mai affezionarsi alle proprie idee, mai considerarle verità assolute. Sempre sapersi mettere in discussione.

E la satira aiuto questo processo davvero evolutivo, di continuo miglioramento.

Ecco perché salutiamo con piacere questo nuovo corso nel mondo arabo.

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__002

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__003

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__004

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__005

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__006

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__007

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__008

2017-10-09__Umoristi_Arabia__010

 

Pubblicato in: Islamizzazione dell'Occidente

Macron. I francesi si scoprono xenofobi e razzisti. Troppi immigrati incompatibili.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-08-09.

2017-08-05__Francia__001

Passate le elezioni è venuta a meno la necessità di drogare le indagini demoscopiche con falsi risultati.

L’indagine Ipsos è tranchant, e rende ben ragione del comportamento assunto del Presidente Macron.

«France’s new president clearly has some healing to do when it comes to two longstanding divisive issues in France. Immigration and the place of Islam in society, are still very much contentious questions for the French, a new annual survey has revealed»

*

«61 percent of French people share the belief that “immigrants in France do not make an effort to integrate”.»

*

«46 percent of French people believe it’s not difficult for an immigrant to integrate»

*

«78 percent of French people are of the view that Islam “seeks to impose its way of life on others”.»

*

«46% of the French polled said that “even if it is not its main message, Islam still contains within it the seeds of violence and intolerance”»

*

«60 percent of the people …. believe the religion of Islam is incompatible with the values of the French Republic»

* * * * * * * *

Le percentuali riscontrate sono davvero molto elevate, risultati ben al di sopra della usuale fascia di errore: sono molto significative.

Ne esce un ritratto dei francesi e della Francia aderente alla realtà che si constata ogni giorno, opposta al quadretto che era propinato in periodo elettorale.

Alla luce di questi dati ben si comprende il comportamento assunto da Mr Macron sull’immigrazione.


The Local. 2017-07-04. Too many foreigners in France and Islam not compatible, majority of French say

Most French people say there are too many foreigners in France, immigrants do not make an effort to assimilate and Islam is incompatible with the French values.

*

France’s new president clearly has some healing to do when it comes to two longstanding divisive issues in France.

Immigration and the place of Islam in society, are still very much contentious questions for the French, a new annual survey has revealed.

A poll by the Ipsos institute for Le Monde newspaper has revealed that a majority of 65 percent of French people say there are too many foreigners in France, a figure that has remained elevated in recent years, with the figure as high as 70 percent in 2017.

Another stat demonstrating a majority of French people are uncomfortable with immigration was the 60 percent of people who agreed with the statement: “Today I no longer feel at home like I did before”.

On top of that some 61 percent of French people share the belief that “immigrants in France do not make an effort to integrate”. 

Some 46 percent of French people believe it’s not difficult for an immigrant to integrate.

Unsurprisingly the percentages are far higher among those on the far right  – 95 percent of National Front voters believe there are too many foreigners in France compared to those on the left (46 percent of Socialists).  

When it came to the other ever divisive issue of the role of Islam, 60 percent of the people questioned for the survey titled “French Fractures 2017″, believe the religion of Islam is incompatible with the values of the French Republic”.

In a separate question some 78 percent of French people are of the view that Islam “seeks to impose its way of life on others”. 

Regarding radical Islam, 46% of the French polled said that “even if it is not its main message, Islam still contains within it the seeds of violence and intolerance”.

That reflects a jump of five percentage points on last year’s survey.

France has been at the receiving end of a string of Jihadist terror attacks in recent years, including the November 2015 attack at the Bataclan which claimed 150 lives. 

The repeated terror attacks, which have exposed the deep insecurity around “l’identité nationale”, have led to demands for foreigners to assimilate, rather than just integrate into the French way of life and culture.

In September 2016, The Local reported that French politicians were aggressively demanding immigrants drop their own identities and assimilate into French culture and way of life.

Rows over the influence of Islam regularly flare up in France, whether its over the wearing of the veil, school dinners for Muslim pupils or most notably the wearing of burkinis on French beaches, an issue which made global headlines last Summer when the swimwear was banned by around 30 French mayors last year.

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente

Dopo i tedeschi ‘costernati’ gli australiani frenano l’immigrazione.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-04-23.

2017-04-20__Australia__001

Germania. I tedeschi ‘costernati’ stentano ad integrarsi con i turki.

«Le elezioni turke hanno avuto sui tedeschi lo stesso effetto dei bombardamenti di Amburgo: li hanno portati a capire quello che uno scugnizzo napoletano avrebbe capito benissimo trenta anni fa. Che volete che si dica? Sono un po’ lenti di comprendonio.»

*

«The latest unofficial results show 51.4 percent of voters in Turkey backed plans for an overhaul of the political system which will give Erdogan sweeping new powers, while support among 1.4 million eligible voters in Germany was far higher, at 63 percent»

*

«In the western city of Essen, as many as 75.9 percent backed the “yes” campaign»

*

«Germany is home to some 3 million people with Turkish roots and some politicians said the loyalty many showed to Erdogan, …. pointed to a rejection of democratic values»

*

«Experts say many second and third generation Turks have not successfully integrated into wider German society and language is a problem»

*

«hundreds of thousands of Turks living in Germany are loyal to Germany on an “economic and social level,” – but on a “political and ideological level»

* * * * * * *

Gli australiani hanno recepito in un baleno la lezione tedesca.

– Il numero degli immigrati non deve superare un certo quale valore di soglia, oltre il quale il sistema si destabilizzerebbe.

– La cittadinanza, e quindi il diritto di voto, dovrebbe essere concessa solo in casi di comprovata integrazione, sempre che di integrazione si possa parlare su archi di tempo di pochi anni.

Sono norme di elementare buon senso.

«It is important that they understand that they are making a commitment to our Australian values»

*

«A more stringent English language test involving reading, writing, listening and speaking»

*

«Providing evidence of integration into the community, such as employment history, school enrolment or membership of community organisations»

*

«Having already been a permanent resident for at least four years»

*

Come si vede non si pretende troppo.


Bbc. 2017-04-20. Australia unveils major changes to citizenship process

Australia will make it more difficult to gain citizenship in a major overhaul of its migration process.

Aspiring citizens will undergo tougher tests on their English language skills and ability to demonstrate “Australian values”, PM Malcolm Turnbull said.

Applicants must also have completed four years as a permanent resident – three years longer than at present.

The move comes two days after Australia unveiled stricter visa requirements for skilled workers from overseas.

Mr Turnbull said the changes would ensure that migrants were better integrated into the community.

“It is important that they understand that they are making a commitment to our Australian values,” he said.

What are the changes?

In explaining what constituted “Australian values”, Mr Turnbull said migrants must demonstrate support for religious freedom and gender equality.

“Respect for women and children … that is a key Australian value,” he said, adding domestic violence would not be tolerated.

Other changes to the citizenship process include:

– A more stringent English language test involving reading, writing, listening and speaking;

– Providing evidence of integration into the community, such as employment history, school enrolment or membership of community organisations;

– Having already been a permanent resident for at least four years;

– Allowing applicants to apply only three times, and automatically failing anyone who cheats on a test.

When asked about reports that applicants would be quizzed on whether they supported forced child marriage or female genital mutilation, Mr Turnbull said it was important to “reinforce our values”.

“If we believe that respect for women and children [is an Australian value]… then why should that not be made a key part, a fundamental part, a very prominent part, of our process to be an Australian citizen?”

Tightening rules

The requirements would apply to all new applications for citizenship, the government said.

On Tuesday, the government said it would replace a controversial visa scheme to make it harder for foreign nationals to work in Australia.

Mr Turnbull said both announcements had been made in the national interest.

The opposition Labor Party accused Mr Turnbull of making announcements for political gain.

“It seems a little odd to me that you would actually ask people whether or not they are going to obey the law when they already pledge to obey the law,” said Labor senator Penny Wong.

Pubblicato in: Criminalità Organizzata, Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Senza categoria, Terrorismo Islamico

Il terrorista dei Champs Elysées aveva già fatto un altro attentato.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-04-21.

2017-04-21__Parigi__001

I capi di stato non sono stati eletti per presenziare con volto annoiato ai funerali delle vittime del terrorismo.

Sono stati eletti per estirpare il terrorismo stesso.

Ma è conflittuale finanziare il terrorismo islamico in Medio Oriente ed in Africa, dargli copertura politica ed armarlo, viziare e coccolare gli islamici già presenti sul territorio, finanziare le moschee ove si predica il  terrorismo, rimettere in libertà terroristi già fermati e condannati da un Tribunale, e poi fingere di dolersi se il terrorismo colpisce ancora, facendo morti ammazzati.

Anche alla ipocrisia dovrebbe essere posto un limite.

Il killer sembrerebbe aver usato un kalashnikov: sembrerebbe che in Francia sia più facile procurarsi un kalashnikov che il permesso di parcheggiare l’automobile per strada.

*

«L’attentatore era noto ai servizi di sicurezza»

*

«Aveva già sparato ad un agente nel 2001»

*

«Era nato nella periferia di Parigi»

*

«Un francese, Karim C., forse appoggiato da un complice belga, ha ucciso con un kalashnikov un poliziotto sugli Champs-Elysees e ne ha feriti altri due»

*

«l’attentato è stato compiuto da qualcuno denominato ‘Abu Yusuf al Beljiki’, ovvero “il belga”»

*

«Si chiamava Karim C., era schedato dalla polizia, radicalizzato, con pesanti precedenti»

*

«già 15 anni fa era stato condannato per tentato omicidio di un agente, quindi per aver assalito una guardia in carcere»

* * * * * * *

Cerchiamo di ragionare.

– L’attentatore è un cittadino francese, madrelingua francese, nato nelle banlieue parigine, indottrinato nelle moschee che usano i finanziamenti statali per propalare il terrorismo. Non è un poveraccio immigrato.

– Nel 2001 aveva fatto un attentato sparando ad un agente, condannato per tentato omicidio ma rapidamente rimesso in libertà da una Magistratura connivente.

– Intanto, per perfezionare il curriculum, aveva assalito una guardia in carcere.

– Avrebbe dovuto essere un sorvegliato speciale dei servizi antiterrorismo, invece ha potuto agire indisturbato, come se si fosse preparato per andare a pescare nella Loira.

*

I responsabili di questo ultimo attentato, e di tutti i precedenti, sono il Presidente Hollande, il suo governo socialista, i Magistrati, e tutti i buonisti che frignano sui poveri terroristi incuranti del sangue sparso dalle vittime innocenti.

Adesso, alla luce di quanto successo, rileggetevi bene il manifesto pubblicato dalla massoneria francese:

I massoni francesi esortano al voto. Domenica conteremo quanto valgono.

Queste logge massoniche sono causa efficiente del terrorismo.


Ansa. 2017-04-21. Parigi, ucciso un agente agli Champs Elysées. Abbattuto l’aggressore. L’Isis firma attacco. Presunto complice si presenta ad Anversa

Feriti gravemente altri due agenti. Spari di kalashnikov diretti alla polizia. L’attentatore era noto ai servizi di sicurezza: ‘Aveva già sparato ad un agente nel 2001’. L’episodio è avvenuto a tre giorni dalle elezioni presidenziali in Francia.

*

Il terrorismo irrompe nelle elezioni francesi: ieri sera un 39enne armato di kalashnikov ha sparato sugli Champs-Elysees a Parigi uccidendo un poliziotto e ferendone altri due, prima di venire abbattuto. Rivendicazione dell’Isis. Hollande ha convocato per stamattina un Consiglio di difesa. Presunto complice si presenta alla polizia ad Anversa, ma per procura non c’è alcun legame con il Belgio. Fermate tre persone vicine al killer.

E’ ripreso stamattina il traffico sugli Champs Elysees dopo l’attacco di ieri sera. Come previsto, e’ cominciato questa mattina all’Eliseo un Consiglio di difesa convocato d’urgenza ieri sera dal presidente francese Francois Hollande. 
“Nulla deve ostacolare l’appuntamento democratico”, ha dichiarato il premier francese Bernard Cazeneuve.

Il belga segnalato dalle autorità di Bruxelles a Parigi in relazione all’attentato si è presentato spontaneamente al commissariato di polizia di Anversa. 

Non c’è al momento nessun legame” tra l’attacco a Parigi e il Belgio. Lo ha affermato la Procura federale belga, secondo quanto riporta la tv pubblica fiamminga Vrt. L’uomo presentatosi spontaneamente al commissariato ad Anversa, che ha un alibi e che nega ogni coinvolgimento nei fatti di Parigi, è noto per casi gravi di traffico di stupefacenti ma non ha legami con il terrorismo né è noto per essere radicalizzato, riferisce la Procura.

Diverse armi sono state ritrovate nell’Audi 4 del terrorista ucciso dopo la sparatoria sugli Champs-Elysées: un fucile a pompa e delle armi bianche, tra cui un coltello da cucina.

Tre persone ritenute vicine all’assalitore sono state fermate e interrogate dai servizi antiterrorismo. Si trovavano nelle abitazioni perquisite durante la notte dalla Polizia.

L’attentato, due giorni fa l’avvertimento. Ieri sera, a tre giorni dal primo turno, il terrorismo ha fatto irruzione nelle elezioni presidenziali francesi. Un francese, Karim C., forse appoggiato da un complice belga, ha ucciso con un kalashnikov un poliziotto sugli Champs-Elysees e ne ha feriti altri due. Poi si è dato alla fuga, ma è stato ucciso dopo pochi metri. Prima di mezzanotte, la rivendicazione dell’Isis: l’attentato è stato compiuto da qualcuno denominato ‘Abu Yusuf al Beljiki’, ovvero “il belga”. A Parigi, il killer – come confermato dal procuratore Francois Molins – è stato identificato e la sua abitazione in banlieue di Parigi già perquisita. Si chiamava Karim C., era schedato dalla polizia, radicalizzato, con pesanti precedenti: già 15 anni fa era stato condannato per tentato omicidio di un agente, quindi per aver assalito una guardia in carcere. Era nato nella periferia di Parigi. Il panico si è propagato in pochi istanti, l’intera avenue, la più celebre della capitale, è stata blindata dai furgoni di polizia, dalla Concorde fino all’Etoile. Tutte le fermate del metrò sono state sbarrate, gli abitanti sono stati invitati a non avvicinarsi al quartiere.

L’agenzia Amaq, legata allo Stato Islamico, ha riferito che l’attacco è stato compiuto da “combattenti” dell’Isis, uno dei quali viene individuato in Abu Yusuf al Beljiki, ovvero “il belga”. Lo riferisce il Site.

Erano passati pochi minuti dalle 21 e gli 11 candidati alle presidenziali di domenica erano impegnati da un’ora nell’ultima performance in diretta tv su France 2 quando diverse raffiche di armi automatiche hanno seminato il terrore sugli Champs-Elysees, all’altezza del civico 102, in prossimità dei grandi magazzini britannici ‘Marks & Spencer’. Un uomo è sceso da un’Audi 80 grigia, si è avvicinato ad un furgone parcheggiato con alcuni poliziotti all’interno – agenti della stradale e della municipale – e ha fatto fuoco con un kalashnikov. Un agente è stato ucciso sul colpo, altri due feriti, una passante – una turista straniera – colpita da schegge. L’assalitore si è dato alla fuga, a piedi, abbandonando l’auto. Dopo pochi metri, è stato abbattuto da altri colleghi degli agenti aggrediti, che stavano pattugliando la strada. Testimoni hanno parlato di “una vera e propria esecuzione”. La procura antiterrorismo è stata immediatamente incaricata delle indagini, dopo aver escluso in pochi minuti che si trattasse di una rapina o di criminalità comune. Panico nella strada, in pochi minuti tutto è stato blindato, i tanti negozi ancora aperti sono stati invitati a chiudere immediatamente. Poliziotti e teste di cuoio hanno perquisito ogni centimetro quadrato dei negozi, in particolare il grande magazzino ‘Marks & Spencer’, poi si sono riversati in un parcheggio poco distante, per il sospetto che un complice potesse essere in fuga proprio lì. Sul presunto ‘secondo uomo’, però, non ci sono conferme in Francia, mentre dal Belgio rimbalza la notizia – e la foto – di un complice “arrivato in treno da Bruxelles”. Il suo domicilio belga sarebbe stato già perquisito. 

 Intanto, sul canale pubblico France 2 andava in onda l’ultimo dibattito elettorale, a 3 giorni dalle urne. Per 40 minuti, i candidati si sono succeduti nello studio ma di attentato a Parigi non si è mai parlato. Emmanuel Macron è stato il primo ad esprimere il cordoglio e il dolore per il poliziotto ucciso, Marine Le Pen è indicata da molti come la candidata che più potrebbe trarre vantaggio dall’attentato. All’Eliseo, il primo ministro Bernard Cazeneuve ha raggiunto pochi minuti dopo i fatti il presidente Francois Hollande, che in serata ha confermato come la pista terroristica sia quella che stanno seguendo le autorità. Per questa mattina alle 8, il presidente ha convocato all’Eliseo un Consiglio di difesa, annullando una visita in Bretagna. Anche Le Pen e Fillon hanno annullato gli ultimi comizi previsti per oggi, confermati invece da Macron, Melenchon e Hamon.


Bbc. 2017-04-21. Paris shooting: Gunman was ‘focus of anti-terror’ probe

The gunman who shot dead a policeman in Paris on Thursday has been identified from papers left in his car, but French officials are yet to release his name.

Local media say the 39-year-old lived in the city’s suburbs, and had been seen as a potential Islamist radical.

The gunman wounded two police officers before being shot dead by security forces on the Champs Elysees.

A pump-action shotgun and knives were found in his car, the French TV station BFMTV reported.

Another man suspected of possible links to the attack has turned himself in to Belgian police.

French police have also taken three family members of the gunman into custody, Reuters reports, citing a legal source.

Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said security forces, including elite units, were fully mobilised ahead of Sunday’s presidential poll.

“Nothing must be allowed to impede the fundamental democratic process of our country,” he said after an emergency security cabinet meeting.

So-called Islamic State (IS) has said one of its “fighters” carried out the attack.

What happened on Thursday on the Champs-Elysees?

A car pulled up alongside a police bus just before 21:00 (19:00 GMT) and a man got out, opening fire on the bus with an automatic weapon, Interior Ministry spokesman Pierre-Henry Brandet said.

After killing an officer, the man attempted to run away while shooting at other officers, two of whom he injured, the spokesman added.

He was then shot dead by security forces.

Terrified eyewitness later recounted scenes of panic as they ran for cover after hearing gunfire.

The whole of the Champs Elysees was evacuated.

Because of its worldwide renown and its large number of visitors, the avenue has long been seen as a potential target, the BBC’s Hugh Schofield in Paris reports.

Overnight, a property in the eastern Parisian suburb of Chelles was searched by investigators, who want to know who else – if anyone – may have known about the gunman’s plans.

What is known about the attacker?

Paris prosecutor François Molins said shortly after the shootings that “the attacker’s identity is known and has been verified”.

“I won’t reveal it, because investigations and raids are already under way, in particular to establish whether there is any evidence or not of complicity [in this attack],” he said, adding that more information would be released on Friday.

According to French media, the attacker served several years in prison for firing on police officers with a gun in the early 2000s.

More recently the intelligence services identified him as a potential Islamist radical.

Meanwhile, IS named the attacker as Abu-Yusuf al-Baljiki, in a statement carried by its Amaq news outlet.

The Belgian interior minister told VRT public broadcaster that the perpetrator was a French national.

Could the attack influence the elections?

The attack took place as 11 candidates in Sunday’s closely fought presidential election were engaged in a final joint TV appearance to argue their policies.

Three of the four main candidates, centrist Emmanuel Macron, centre-right Francois Fillon and far-right Marine Le Pen, have called off planned events on Friday, which would have been the final day of campaigning.

Front National candidate Marine Le Pen told a French radio station on Friday morning she feared further attacks, and said France should immediately reinstate border checks.

She tweeted: “I feel for and stand by our security forces, who have been targeted again.”

Meanwhile, Independent centrist Emmanuel Macron urged French citizens not to “give in to fear” in a interview with the RTL station.

He said it was a president’s “first duty to protect” and he expressed his “solidarity” with the police.

Mr Fillon, of the Republican Party, also went on Twitter to pay “tribute to the security forces who give their lives to protect ours”.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, standing for the far left, tweeted: “I strongly feel for the policemen killed and wounded and their families. Terrorist attacks will never go unpunished, accomplices never forgotten.”

Islamist militancy is a major issue in the polls after recent mass attacks claimed by IS, with 238 people killed in jihadist attacks in France since 2015, according to data from AFP news agency.

And how did the world react?

At the White House, US President Donald Trump said people had to be strong and vigilant.

“Our condolences from our country to the people of France,” he said. “It looks like another terrorist attack and… what can you say? It just never ends.”

In the UK, a Downing Street spokesman said: “The UK strongly condemns the appalling terrorist attack in Paris. The Prime Minister (Theresa May) has tonight passed on her condolences to President Hollande.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel pledged to remain “strong and determined” alongside France.

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Religioni

Germania. I tedeschi ‘costernati’ stentano ad integrarsi con i turki.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-04-20.

2017-04-19__Germania. Turki integrati Col c@@o.__001

Rispetto ad altre nazioni la Germania ha il pregio di essere costantemente ripetitiva, caratteristica che la rende molto facilmente prevedibile.

Qualsiasi biblioteca degna di quel nome ha una raccolta del Völkischer Beobachter, «Osservatore popolare», organo ufficiale del partito nazionalsocialista. Leggere le edizioni di fine luglio 1943 è maieutico.

Il 23 luglio il Bomber Command lanciò contro la città di Amburgo una serie di incursioni impiegando oltre tremila bombardieri strategici, che si schermavano dietro un muro di “window“, piccole strisce di carta stagnola che misero fuori uso i radar tedeschi. Il 74% di Amburgo fu rasa al suolo, cinquemila fabbriche furono distrutte, unitamente agli otto cantieri navali: tra morti e feriti si conteggiarono un minimo di 100,000 perdite.

Il Völkischer Beobachter pubblicò articoli “esterrefatti” di come avesse potuto succedere un fatto del genere: quello di Amburgo era il primo bombardamento in grande stile degli agglomerati urbani tedeschi. Non solo: quegli screanzati degli Alleati avevano alla fine compiuto più di una decina di incursioni consecutive con perdite minime. I loro aerei da bombardamento giravano quasi indisturbati sulla Germania e bombardavano dove e quando volevano.

I fatti, e fatti ben evidenti, contraddicevano sfacciatamente quanto fino ad allora sostenuto dalla propaganda ufficiale, ossia che la Germania fosse inattaccabile, che gli alleati mai e poi mai si sarebbero azzardati a fare cose del genere, che la Luftwaffe era forza preponderante.

Il grande risultato di questi bombardamenti fu la messa a nudo di un’altra caratteristica tipica dei tedeschi: fino a tanto che non sono presi a cannonate o bombardati per benino non capiscono proprio nulla, si crogiolano nelle loro illusioni megalomani. Quando invece iniziano contare i propri morti, allora mostrano qualche barlume intellettivo. Più morti contano e meglio ragionano.

* * * * * * *

Le elezioni turke hanno avuto sui tedeschi lo stesso effetto dei bombardamenti di Amburgo: li hanno portati a capire quello che uno scugnizzo napoletano avrebbe capito benissimo trenta anni fa. Che volete che si dica? Sono un po’ lenti di comprendonio.

*

«The latest unofficial results show 51.4 percent of voters in Turkey backed plans for an overhaul of the political system which will give Erdogan sweeping new powers, while support among 1.4 million eligible voters in Germany was far higher, at 63 percent»

*

«In the western city of Essen, as many as 75.9 percent backed the “yes” campaign»

*

«Germany is home to some 3 million people with Turkish roots and some politicians said the loyalty many showed to Erdogan, …. pointed to a rejection of democratic values»

*

«Experts say many second and third generation Turks have not successfully integrated into wider German society and language is a problem»

*

«The local mosques are polling stations for (Turkey’s ruling party) the AKP»

*

«They wanted to protest about what they have felt for decades … That they feel discriminated against, that they feel excluded»

Ricapitolando.

I turki se ne impippano dei ‘valori‘ tedeschi. E questo sarebbe ancora il meno. Si lagnano anche ad alta voce che in Germania si sentono “discriminated” ed anche “excluded“. In parole povere. sono i tedeschi a doveri integrare con i turki, mica il contrario.

* * * * * * * *

Ma la vetta dello stupore e della costernazione corona il Deutsche Welle, organo di stampa governativo, maso chiuso dei socialdemocratici ideologizzati, degno successore del Völkischer Beobachter nazionalsocialista.

«More than 63 percent of the Turkish population in Germany cast “yes” votes in last Sunday’s referendum on enhancing the power and scope Turkish presidency»

*

«the number of votes from Germany amounted to 0.23 percent of the total, where just over 51 percent of voters agreed to give current Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan sweeping powers»

*

«German population with Turkish roots helps Erdogan win»

*

«It wasn’t exorbitant, but the expat Turkish vote has hit a nerve»

*

«hundreds of thousands of Turks living in Germany are loyal to Germany on an “economic and social level,” – but on a “political and ideological level, they are loyal to Er­do­gan»

*

«existing conflict between Turkey and the EU, between a Christian and a predominantly Muslim society»

*

«Germany has a community of about three million residents with Turkish roots»

* * * * * * * *

Il cuore del problema è racchiuso in pochissime parole:

«many second and third generation Turks

have not successfully integrated»

*

Nessun turko e nessun musulmano potrà mai “integrarsi” nella attuale Weltanschauung tedesca ed occidentale in genere. Soltanto un tedesco liberal oppure socialista ideologico poteva credersi questa barzelletta.

Mentre turki ed islamici possono benissimo convivere con i cristiani cattolici, secoli di storia lo attestano, i “valori” basati sul rigetto attivo della religione e della tradizione, il relativismo etico e morale che consegue al processo sincretico, e quella sorta di religione cultuale della morte professata dagli attuali occidentali sono in stridente contrasto con la visione di vita islamica. Turki ed islamici non ne vogliono sapere proprio nulla. Così come non ne vogliono sapere di una “democrazia” intesa ed estinta nel “suffragio universale“. Loro vogliono Erdogan.

Tollerano la coabitazione, assorbono taluni costumi di vita, ma non ci si illuda: vestirsi all’occidentale invece che indossare il caftano non implica minimamente pensarla come pensa Frau Merkel.

Ed è stato proprio il voto dei turki che vivono in Germania quello determinante per la vittoria di Mr Erdogan. Brava Frau Merkel, li hai allevati bene.

 *

Ora i tedeschi iniziano a capire che se li sono presi in casa, ed iniziano anche a razionalizzare come grazie alla cultura occidentale della morte gli islamici procreino mentre loro sono sterili nella mente, nel cuore e, quindi, nell’utero.

Germania. Incidenza economica del calo demografico. – Bloomberg.

Germania. Realtà geografica, non più umana, politica ed economica.

Germania. Summit in Cancelleria per l’allarme demografico.

Già.

Erdogan ai turchi che vivono in Europa: “Fate almeno cinque figli, il futuro è vostro”

I turki crescono di numero, e votano. I tedeschi autoctoni decrescono di numero, ed i morti non votano.

Elezioni Olandesi. Il vero fatto nuovo. Denk.

Quindici anni, e gli equilibri numerici saranno rotti: e con il suffragio universale il voto di un turco vale il voto di un tedesco.

Oggi sono state le elezioni turke, domani saranno quelle tedesche, dopodomani quelle per il parlamento europeo, e così via. Ed ogni giorno che passa il numero dei turki e degl islamici aumenta e quello degli autoctoni diminuisce: assassinano i loro stessi figli con l’aborto generalizzato. E chi sfuggisse avrebbe un radioso avvenire di diversamente senziente ed alteramente pensante.

*

Conclusioni.

Adesso che è troppo tardi i tedeschi iniziano a rendersi conto del macello che hanno fatto.

La loro Weltanschauung liberal e socialista li sta portando alla rovina, così come la loro cultura della morte. Si stanno suicidando con la loro cultura di morte.

Non sono turki ed islamici a doversi integrare con i tedeschi assimilandone gli ideali di vita: sono i tedeschi che dovranno imparare ad assimilasi ai turki ed agli islamici.

Gli anni di predominio islamico in Germania saranno terribili per gli autoctoni: la pagheranno e con gli interessi. I turki non sono per nulla buonisti. Quindici anni e le femine tedesche marceranno a passo dell’oca: ne vedremo delle belle!

A fine maggio si terrà la prima riunione dei partiti islamici che operano in Europa. Un mese dopo, a fine giugno in un ridente paesino mitteleuropeo, si riuniranno i rappresentanti di tutte le principali organizzazioni informali anti-establishment: non i partiti politici, bensì quelle che operano come supporter.

Per liberals, socialisti ideologici e per i loro sostenitori si prospettano tempi duri: il redde rationem si sta avvicinando a grandi passi.

Costernazione“? Terrore di essere trattati per come hanno trattato.

E così saranno trattati: tutti, non uno escluso. Nessuno si faccia illusioni di sorta.


Reuters. 2017-04-19. Pro-Erdogan vote among Turks in Germany unleashes integration row

Shocked by the support among Turks in Germany for handing new powers to President Tayyip Erdogan in Sunday’s referendum, several senior German lawmakers called on Tuesday for the rules on dual citizenship to be tightened.

The latest unofficial results show 51.4 percent of voters in Turkey backed plans for an overhaul of the political system which will give Erdogan sweeping new powers, while support among 1.4 million eligible voters in Germany was far higher, at 63 percent.

In the western city of Essen, as many as 75.9 percent backed the “yes” campaign, although some commentators cautioned that turnout in Germany was only 44 percent.

Germany is home to some 3 million people with Turkish roots and some politicians said the loyalty many showed to Erdogan, a leader viewed by many in the European Union as increasingly authoritarian, pointed to a rejection of democratic values.

“Those in a liberal country like Germany who vote to abolish freedom in Turkey or to limit it have obviously not accepted our values,” said Free Democrat (FDP) leader Christian Lindner, adding that Turks in Germany must respect its constitution.

Senior politicians in Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives called for action.

“It is important that we reverse the changes that made it easier to get dual citizenship,” said Bavarian conservative Stephan Mayer. The rules were relaxed in 2000 and 2014.

About five months before a federal election, the right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD), polling at between 7 and 11 percent, demanded a complete end to dual citizenship for Turks.

“That it needed a referendum in Turkey for the conservatives to realize that integration, above all of Turks, has failed, shows how removed they are,” said Emil Saenze, deputy head of the AfD parliamentary group in Baden-Wuerttemberg.

Many Turks came to West Germany after World War Two, providing labor for its “economic miracle”. Experts say many second and third generation Turks have not successfully integrated into wider German society and language is a problem.

The head of the Turkish Communities in Germany said those who backed Erdogan were protesting against their situation in the country.

“They wanted to protest about what they have felt for decades,” Gokay Sofuoglu told SWR radio. “That they feel discriminated against, that they feel excluded,” he said.

Observers also point out that many Turks in Germany come from conservative, rural areas of Turkey such as Anatolia and that the largest association of mosques in Germany, Ditib, brings in imams from Turkey.

“The local mosques are polling stations for (Turkey’s ruling party) the AKP,” sociologist Necla Kelek told Bild daily.


Deutsche Welle. 2017-04-19. Why many Turks in Germany voted ‘yes’ in Erdogan’s referendum

Hundreds of thousands of expat Turkish citizens in Germany voted in favor of giving sweeping new powers to the office of the Turkish president. Many Germans, and Turks who voted “no,” are taken aback.

*

More than 63 percent of the Turkish population in Germany cast “yes” votes in last Sunday’s referendum on enhancing the power and scope Turkish presidency.

According to Yunus Ulusoy of the Essen-based Center for Turkey Studies and Integration Research (ZfTI,) the number of votes from Germany amounted to 0.23 percent of the total, where just over 51 percent of voters agreed to give current Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan sweeping powers.

All the same, the percentage of “yes” votes by Turks living in Germany prompted Germany’s mass-selling daily newspaper Bild to run with the headline “German population with Turkish roots helps Erdogan win.”

Voter turnout of in Germany was about 49 percent – so all in all, less than half a million Turkish residents in Germany eligible to vote in the referendum supported President Erdogan’s bid to end the country’s current parliamentary political system.

Germany has a community of about three million residents with Turkish roots, roughly half of whom were entitled to vote in Sunday’s referendum.

Consternation in Germany

It wasn’t exorbitant, but the expat Turkish vote has hit a nerve.

The head of Germany’s Greens Party said on Tuesday that some Turkish citizens living in Germany seem to think they can “get away with touching the constitution with just the tips of their toes.” To be happy in the long run in Germany, people have to completely accept the “values and constitution of our country,” said 51-year-old Cem Öz­de­mir, himself of Turkish descent.

Germany is going to have to accept the fact that hundreds of thousands of Turks living in Germany are loyal to Germany on an “economic and social level,” – but on a “political and ideological level, they are loyal to Er­do­gan,” commented Christian Democratic (CDU) politician Wolf­gang Bos­bach.

Protest against adopted homeland

Largely, their vote was a form of protest, said Detlef Pollack, a professor of sociology of religion at Münster University who has conducted extensive studies on the integration of Turks living in Germany.

“Older men in particular like the fact that someone is finally showing the West, the EU, how things should be; it’s an expression of defiance, assertiveness and resentment,” Pollack told DW, adding he was surprised that Turks living in Germany were prepared to give in to these feelings, so frivolously jeopardizing Turkey’s democratic achievements.

Professor Pollack is convinced people want to preserve democracy in Turkey. On the other hand, he points out the existing conflict between Turkey and the EU, between a Christian and a predominantly Muslim society – “a conflict that overshadows political issues.”

“It’s difficult to cast a clear political vote because suddenly, questions of pride, nationality, identity and religion gain importance to a degree that political pragmatism takes a back seat.”

Opposed to a ‘one-man regime’

Concerned about a “one-man regime,” the Turkish community in Germany said in various newspaper interviews that they would strive to find a way to better communicate with “Turks living in freedom in Germany but who desire an autocracy for Turks living in Turkey.”

Thomas Kufen, mayor of the western German city of Essen, wonders why President Erdogan’s policies are attractive to Turks living in Germany.

The answer, the mayor told German WDR radio, appears to be that in appealing directly to Turks in Germany, Erdogan treats them with the respect they miss in German society, and from German politicians.

The number of expat Turkish voters in his city who cast a “yes” ballot was 75 percent.

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Unione Europea

Partito Islamico Francese. Verosimile desistenza de facto con la Le Pen.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-04-14.

2017-04-10__Partito Ilsamico Francese.__001

In questa campagna elettorale è stato detto tutto ed il contrario di tutto.

Manca solo l’annuncio che Mrs Marine le Pen voterà per Mr Macron, e viceversa.

*

La Francia ha 65.5 milioni di abitanti e circa 7 milioni di immigrati: gli islamici assommano ad un po’ meno di sei milioni.

Come premessa segnaliamo la nascita del Partito Islamico Francese, propugnato dalla Union of France’s Mosques: per il momento come movimento non registrato, ma pur presente. Obbiettivo riferito sarebbero le prossime elezioni per il parlamento europeo, sempre che a tale epoca la Francia faccia ancora parte dell’Unione Europea.

A fine maggio il Partito Islamico Francese dovrebbe partecipare alla riunione organizzativa dei partititi islamici che stanno nascendo in quasi tutti gli stati dell’Unione Europea. La loro base elettorale non è ancora enorme, ma è molto compatta. Un iti possono ottenere molto.

*

Gli islamici francesi hanno lunga tradizione d voto per il partito socialista francese.

«In 2012 some 86 percent of France’s Muslim population voted for François Hollande and like other Hollande voters, particularly the working classes, many feel let down over the lack of real change»

*

Le cose sono però mutate, anche se solo lo spoglio elettorale potrà dire fino  qual punto.

«It’s true that Marine Le Pen is an Islamophobe, but they all are, so what’s the difference? She is the only one who will talk about it openly, while the rest of the candidates are Islamophobes but just keep it inside»

*

«Muslim voters are first and foremost French citizens like other voters, which in 2017 means the same anger, apathy and indifference towards politics that has afflicted other sections of the population has also seeped into the Muslim community»

*

«I’m a Muslim but I’m not against Le Pen. I honestly don’t think she is actually racist – she is just against anyone who is causing problems. I don’t think it matters if they’re Muslims, refugees, from the Roma community, the yobs….that’s why a lot of people in France are uniting with her»

*

«some 4 percent of Muslim voters opted for Le Pen in the first round of the 2012 election, but that number is expected to jump this time round as the taboo around the party has fallen.»

*

«Some Muslim voters may be enticed to Le Pen over her desire to scrap the gay marriage bill, which many protested against in 2013»

*

«Many of the people here at the mosque aren’t interested in politics. People here feel mistreated, they think the politicians are all hypocrites, why would they vote?»

* * * * * * *

Esiste sicuramente la possibilità che le autorità religiose chiamino gli islamici ad un voto contro Mrs Marine Le Pen

«If in the second round there’s a risk of the Front National winning, we may call on French Muslims to vote against Le Pen»

ma ben pochi islamici francesi odono la voce delle moschee: ben pochi le frequentano.

Per la maggior parte di loro, che combattono ogni giorno per pranzo e cena, i problemi sono quelli di utti gli alri francesi

«why would they vote?».

*

«Some Muslim voters may be enticed to Le Pen over her desire to scrap the gay marriage bill, which many protested against in 2013?»

L’astensionismo sembrerebbe essere la più potente arma in mano a Mrs Marine Le Pen.


The Local. 2017-04-08. Why France’s Muslim voters are not all panicking about a Le Pen victory

Marine Le Pen, who wants to ban the Islamic headscarf, might be threatening to pull off a shock election win but that doesn’t mean France’s Muslim voters are all panicking over the far-right, National Front candidate taking power.

*

The name Marine Le Pen is routinely preceded by the words “anti-Islam”.

Even though she herself has moved to soften her image with Muslim voters by insisting their religion is indeed “compatible with the French Republic” (much to the disgust of some in her party), it’s not hard to see why she has a reputation for being an Islamophobe.

She once described Muslims praying in the streets of French cities in protest over a lack of mosque space to being akin to the Nazi occupation and has regularly taken aim at halal food, the veil, the burkini, and various other aspects of Muslim culture.

With experts refusing to rule out a shock Le Pen victory carried by the same wave of nationalist populism that swept Donald Trump to power, you would think France’s Muslim community, believed to number between four and six million, would be in a panic with the election just weeks away.

And while there is no doubt concern, there are reasons why France’s Muslims are not all frantically preparing for the worst.

  1. Because many voters distrust other candidates as much as they do Le Pen 

When The Local talked to worshippers at a mosque in north east Paris not one singled Le Pen out as being worse than the other candidates.

Amadou, 57, said he still doesn’t know who he will vote for, but that he has no intention of voting “against” Marine Le Pen. 

“It’s true that Marine Le Pen is an Islamophobe, but they all are, so what’s the difference? She is the only one who will talk about it openly, while the rest of the candidates are Islamophobes but just keep it inside.”

Many Muslims in France feel the country’s politicians and political parties across the spectrum all resort to Muslim bashing in order to try and win votes.

While Marine Le Pen might have made a name for herself as being “anti-Islam”, François Fillon has been equally if not more critical of the religion.

“In France there is a problem linked to Islam,” said Fillon recently, who wrote a book titled “Conquering Islamic Totalitarianism” and who wants to impose administrative controls on the religion.

Amar Lasfar, president of the Union of Islamic Organisations in France (UOIF), blasted all the candidates in the election race.

“They know nothing about Islam nor about Muslims,” he said.

Leftist candidates Jean-Luc Melenchon and Benoit Hamon might have something to say about that, so too the centrist liberal Emmanuel Macron, who recently blasted Le Pen for trying “to turn France’s Muslim voters into enemies of the Republic”.

But Henni-Moulai, the founder of the website Melting Book, which aims to amplify minority voices in the media, believes Macron will fall into the same trap as other politicians at some point.

“Muslim bashing is inescapable, especially if you want to reach the Elysée palace,” she told Al Jazeera news site.

  1. Because Muslims, like many French voters, just feel disenfranchised altogether

As Mohammed Moussaoui, the president of the Union of France’s Mosques, told The Local, Muslim voters are first and foremost French citizens like other voters, which in 2017 means the same anger, apathy and indifference towards politics that has afflicted other sections of the population has also seeped into the Muslim community.

In 2012 some 86 percent of France’s Muslim population voted for François Hollande and like other Hollande voters, particularly the working classes, many feel let down over the lack of real change.

So even the threat of Le Pen is not enough to motivate them to vote, and with France set for record abstention rates, its clear the country’s Muslims are not the only disenchanted ones.

At the mosque in the 19th arrondissement of Paris, a middle-aged man named Ismail, originally from Algeria, told The Local he would not be voting.

“Many of the people here at the mosque aren’t interested in politics. People here feel mistreated, they think the politicians are all hypocrites, why would they vote?” he said.

  1. Because they know there are safeguards even if she wins

Even if Le Pen does pull off the type of shock populist win that led to Brexit and Trump, Muslims are confident that France’s constitution and its political institutions will hold her back from doing exactly what she wants.

For a start Le Pen’s party, only having two MPs currently, is unlikely to gain a majority in the parliamentary elections in June and without a majority in parliament she will find it difficult passing any of the reforms she plans, including banning Muslim women from wearing the headscarf in public places.

“Muslims, like other French citizens, will have confidence in the country’s institutions that will put limits on her power,” Mohammed Moussaoui from the Union of France’s Mosques told The Local.

“There is the constitutional council which makes sure all laws are in line with the French constitution,” he said. 

“It will be hard for her as president. She will need the ability to unite people, which will be difficult for her,” he added, pointing to the fact that other parties are unlikely to enter into coalition with Le Pen.

His view was backed by an Algerian-born Muslim named Ismael, who told The Local:

“Even if she does win it doesn’t matter. I’m not scared of her. Why would I be scared of her? It’s not as if she will have the power to change laws and make life difficult for immigrants or Muslims. That’s why they have the constitution and the National Assembly.”

  1. Because Le Pen has successfully softened her image… even with Muslims

Le Pen has made big efforts to soften the image of her party – which under her father Jean-Marie (see photo below) was seen as a bastion of racists and colonial settlers returning from Algeria as well as apologists for the wartime Vichy regime’s collaboration with Nazi Germany. 

Recently she has been at pains to point out that she is not anti-Islam but anti-Islamic fundamentalism and extremists.

As she tries to widen her appeal and make herself more electable she has tried to appease fears among Muslims by stressing she feels Islam is perfectly compatible with the French Republic, a quote that did not sit well with many of her party members.

Rachid, an Algerian-born man in his thirties, told The Local: “I’m a Muslim but I’m not against Le Pen. I honestly don’t think she is actually racist – she is just against anyone who is causing problems. I don’t think it matters if they’re Muslims, refugees, from the Roma community, the yobs….that’s why a lot of people in France are uniting with her.”

  1. Because some Muslim voters will actually back Le Pen

Mohammed Moussaoui said the Muslim community, like the rest of France, is made of up of voters of all political persuasions, even those who will vote for Marine Le Pen.

According to Le Point magazine some 4 percent of Muslim voters opted for Le Pen in the first round of the 2012 election, but that number is expected to jump this time round as the taboo around the party has fallen.

These voters often find extremist Islam and communalism as distasteful as Le Pen does and her talk of cracking down on crime and battling globalisation appeals to voters in poor, peripheral areas, Muslims included.

Some Muslim voters may be enticed to Le Pen over her desire to scrap the gay marriage bill, which many protested against in 2013.

In the 2015 regional elections the National Front made a special effort to woo Muslim voters in the poor Paris suburbs.

“We’ll tell them they’re as French as the others,” was the message and observers say the National Front allows those Muslims who feel French first and foremost to express their identity.

  1. Because many still believe she won’t win

“Although the polls suggest she will win the first, they also say she will lose the second round,” said Moussaoui. “We have to take both polls together.”

While no analyst will rule out a Le Pen win, there are reasons why it’s still highly unlikely to happen. 

… But let’s not pretend no one is worried.

Despite all this it would be wrong to say the Muslim community were not at all concerned about the thought of Marine Le Pen taking power.

Slimane Nadour, head of communication at Paris’s Grand Mosque said the community was concerned by the election and the prospect of a Le Pen victory.

“Today, we are a little afraid, of course, of having a National Front with Marine Le Pen that’s very strong.” 

“There’s a push towards extreme right and xenophobic parties across Europe, but especially in France and obviously, French Muslims are worried.”

“Le Pen says Nous sommes chez nous (this is our home), but this is our home too. And we want to feel at home, and be on good terms with everybody no matter their religion or beliefs.”

The Grand Mosque is ready to take an unprecedented step if Marine Le Pen, as expected, makes it through to the second round run-off vote.

“If in the second round there’s a risk of the Front National winning, we may call on French Muslims to vote against Le Pen.” 

“Calling on people to vote is very rare, the Grande Mosquée has never called on people to vote for a candidate.”

“People are scared at the moment, in this climate of xenophobia and Islamophobia.”

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Unione Europea

Germania. Bancarotta per chi si dichiarò garante degli immigrati.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-04-13.

Bundestag 001

Questa storia evidenzia come Kafka si vissuto e morto invano.

Cerchiamo di raccontarla con ordine, tenendo conto che ci si avvarrà anche di documentazione non riportata per limitazione di spazio.

*

Quando iniziò ad aumentare in modo consistente il numero dei migranti che vi arrivavano da ogni parte richiamati a gran voce dal governo allora in carica, vi fu un proliferare di associazioni che nominalmente avrebbero dovuto aiutare i migranti, e che per far ciò ricevevano sovvenzioni da parte dello stato federale e di quello locale.

Era la “società civile” che dimostrava il suo benvenuto: una propalazione della socialdemocrazia tedesca, con qualche presenza dei cristiano-democratici. Quattro gatti spelacchiati spacciati per tutta la nazione.

La pappa era servita in tavola e la gente era pronta con il tovagliolo al collo, forchetta nella sinistra e coltello nella destra: una grande abbuffata.

Poi, come sempre accade negli ambienti ideologizzati, ci fu chi volle essere più papista del papa.

Dio ci scampi dagli zelanti” soleva dire il grande Disraeli.

 Dapprima si fece una lacrimevole campagna stampa e mediatica.

I poveri immigrati che vivevano senza la tenera vicinanza dell’adorata mogliettina ed il calore dei figli, strappati agli affetti familiari dalla crudele società occidentale, decadente e colonialista. Capitalista, codina ed omofoba.

Il volume della campagna crebbe giorno per giorno: anche i tedeschi hanno un cuore mite e generoso.

Alla fine il governo mollò, tutto felice di farlo: caspiterina, ma che i familiari si ricongiungano!

Ed in questa maniera si quadruplicò il numero dei migranti assistiti, e con essi i contributi governativi.

Il business era andato a buon fine, non certo per il Contribuente, ma per quanti potevano immergere il mestolo nel minestrone. E che razza di mestolo!!

La legge che permetteva i ricongiungimenti, in cauda veneno, aveva però un minuscolo comma, di quelli in cui eccellono i burocrati. I migranti che richiamavano i familiari avrebbero dovuto dimostrare di guadagnare quel tanto che sarebbe bastato a mantenerli.

Già.

Ma se guadagnavano non sarebbero stati assistiti: di miserabili c’è sempre un grande bisogno, ed in carenza, li si genera senza andar tanto a guardare per il sottile. Le leggi le consultano quelli che proprio non sanno come fare a regolarsi.

Ma se miserabili, come avrebbero potuto dimostrare di guadagnare quel tanto che sarebbe bastato a mantenere “their loved ones“?

L’idea fu un vero lampo di ingegno.

I tedeschi delle associazioni “benefiche” e “caritative” avrebbero dato una garanzia. Poi, a morire ed a pagare c’è sempre tempo.

*

Ma tutti sanno che il diavolo si cela nei particolari. Correggiamoci: questo lo sanno solo i credenti. Per gli altri non esiste o, meglio, se esistesse sarebbe sicuramente Mr Trump oppure Frau Frauke Petry.

«But what was supposed to be a generous one-time gesture to help reunite families is turning into a financial nightmare for guarantors»

Il solito burocrate iperscrupoloso, il burocrate teutone, iniziò a chiedersi quando sarebbe stato il termine della garanzia. Era un burocrate segretamente militante di Pegida. Altri dicono che fosse una spia al soldo di Mr Putin, di cui non si pensa mai male a sufficienza.

Ne nacque una bega da lavandaie ai trogoli fino a tanto che il tutto finì di fronte ad una Corte di Giustizia.

Alcuni dicevano che l’obbligazione era dovuta fino all’ottenimento del diritto di asilo, altri invece a tempo indefinito: più tutte le possibili varianti del caso. Di sicuro, non era una una tantum.

Anche la cifra era all’epoca molto mal definita.

«Germany’s Federal Administrative Court decided in summer 2016»

*

«the judges stated that guarantors who signed for refugees before the clarification was in place are accountable for three years after the family’s arrival; everyone who becomes a guarantor after is accountable for five years, no matter the refugees’ asylum status»

*

Infine, la mazzata: il disturbo era solo 14,000 euro a semestre, 28,000 euro all’anno. I signori sono pregati di accomodarsi in cassa; talini a versare tre anni, 84,000 euro cash, altri cinque anni, 140,000 euro cash.

Adesso, lasciamo ai signori Lettori l’onere di moltiplicare quelle cifre unitarie per gli oltre 800,000 migranti assistiti con garanzia. Una gran bella cifretta.

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

«Flüchtlingshilfe Mittelhessen» «Pro Asyl» etc.

*

«Germans wanting to aid refugees now at risk of bankruptcy»

*

«In 2013, the state government established a program that would allow Syrians who had been in Germany for a while to bring their families to the country as well – under the condition that they had proof of sufficient income to provide accommodation and food for their loved ones»

*

«Since not all refugees who wanted to bring their families had this, Grothe, who is a psychiatrist in the city of Giessen, and roughly 30 other volunteers jumped in.»

*

«They signed an agreement stating they’d guarantee the state wouldn’t have to pay for the refugee families coming to live in Germany»

*

«In other cases, the guarantors helped out with five hundred or five thousand Euros»

*

«But what was supposed to be a generous one-time gesture to help reunite families is turning into a financial nightmare for the Giessen guarantors»

*

«there was an ongoing discussion about whether obligations ended once the refugees that the guarantor cosigned for were granted asylum»

*

«That’s what Hessen’s interior ministry promised Klaus-Dieter Grothe and the other guarantors. But that’s not how Germany’s Federal Administrative Court decided in summer 2016»

*

«the judges stated that guarantors who signed for refugees before the clarification was in place are accountable for three years after the family’s arrival; everyone who becomes a guarantor after is accountable for five years, no matter the refugees’ asylum status»

*

«Guarantors are now supposed to pay back the benefits refugees they have co-signed for are receiving»

*

«For a Syrian family of four, the costs they are supposedly obliged to meet can reach up to 14,000 Euros every six months»

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

È da anni che lo ripetiamo agli amici tedeschi.

Prendetevi qualche napoletano verace e piazzatelo nel migliore hotel disponibile con tutte le comodità del caso. Trattatelo come un cristallo di Murano. Una volta all’anno, senza tediarlo, chiedetegli un consiglio ed eseguitelo pari pari.

È un gran brutto segno di decadenza se non sanno nemmeno più far schierare un giudice dalla loro parte.


Deutsche Welle. 2017-04-12. Germans wanting to aid refugees now at risk of bankruptcy

Volunteers who wanted to help Syrian refugees bring their families to Germany now face huge payments – because a law was changed after they signed their guarantor obligations.

*

Klaus-Dieter Grothe and other volunteers helping out with the “Flüchtlingshilfe Mittelhessen,” an aid organization helping refugees in the German state of Hessen, are what many local politicians would consider dream citizens. They are not only welcoming toward refugees, they are willing to take responsibility. This openness is now coming back to haunt them.

In 2013, the state government established a program that would allow Syrians who had been in Germany for a while to bring their families to the country as well – under the condition that they had proof of sufficient income to provide accommodation and food for their loved ones.

Since not all refugees who wanted to bring their families had this, Grothe, who is a psychiatrist in the city of Giessen, and roughly 30 other volunteers jumped in. They signed an agreement stating they’d guarantee the state wouldn’t have to pay for the refugee families coming to live in Germany.

“In some cases, the guarantors didn’t actually pay for anything,” Grothe told DW. “The Syrian families only needed the opportunity to bring their loved ones and ended up sleeping in a room with five people instead of two or made food for eight people instead of five. In other cases, the guarantors helped out with five hundred or five thousand Euros.”

But what was supposed to be a generous one-time gesture to help reunite families is turning into a financial nightmare for the Giessen guarantors.

Until recently, there was an ongoing discussion about whether obligations ended once the refugees that the guarantor cosigned for were granted asylum. That’s what Hessen’s interior ministry promised Klaus-Dieter Grothe and the other guarantors. But that’s not how Germany’s Federal Administrative Court decided in summer 2016.

Instead, the judges stated that guarantors who signed for refugees before the clarification was in place are accountable for three years after the family’s arrival; everyone who becomes a guarantor after is accountable for five years, no matter the refugees’ asylum status.

Job centers in the Giessen area that have been paying benefits to refugees are making use of the updated ruling. Guarantors are now supposed to pay back the benefits refugees they have co-signed for are receiving.

Guarantors made to pay thousands of euros

“Our interior ministry promised us that our responsibility would 100 percent end after the refugees were granted asylum here,” Grothe said. “Now the job centers are saying ‘Your obligation is still in place and we want the money back that we paid for your refugees!'”

Grothe sounds angry when he’s talking about the issue because some of his fellow guarantors are getting desperate. For a Syrian family of four, the costs they are supposedly obliged to meet can reach up to 14,000 Euros every six months.

Since that is not what they signed up for, the Giessen guarantors are now suing. Until the lawsuit at the Giessen administrative court is settled, they don’t have to pay. But what they really want is for the state to acknowledge the original promise and take over the payments for them.

A spokesperson for Hessen’s interior ministry pointed out, however, that there is nothing they can do, as it’s actually the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs that has authority over the job centers making the demands.

“Hessen has implored the federal authorities in charge several times to not demand payments from the guarantors,” the ministry stated in an email to DW. “The state regrets that the job centers… are so far not willing to give in.”

The Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs did not reply to DW’s request for comment on the day of reporting.

‘A big obligation’ to take on

Bernd Mesovic, head of the legal department of refugee rights organization Pro Asyl, believes the Giessen guarantors have good chances of winning their legal battle and getting out of the payments, since they entered the obligation under false impressions in the first place.

He also stresses, however, that the step of becoming a guarantor for a refugee so that his or her family can come to Germany is very risky.

“It’s a big obligation these people are taking on,” Mesovic told DW. “I tell everyone considering it to think about it really, really hard. You have to be extremely careful in your consideration of what you can afford and what would happen if you lost your job, for example. The obligation won’t go away then – you’ll still be a guarantor. People have had to file for personal bankruptcy.”

Grothe, and the 30 other guarantors in Hessen, hope that it won’t come to that in their case.

Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Islamizzazione dell'Occidente, Senza categoria, Unione Europea

Germania. 13 milioni di poveri e 330,000 famiglie con la luce tagliata.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-03-04.

das-brandenburger-tor-in-berlin

La Germania è un paese socialmente avanzato ed evoluto.

A quanto riporterebbero i media, la conversione della popolazione tedesca ad esseri alteramente e differentemente pensanti e senzienti dovrebbe essere quasi terminata, mentre procede a ritmo di galoppo l’islamizzazione.

È l’apoteosi della Lgbt, che alleva i bimbi fin dalla culla alla nobile costumanza degli amori castrensi e saffici.

La Germania è talmente avanzata che ha persino la Cancelliera assunta in quote rosa.

Paradiso degli anfiboli, e giusta repressione di quanti fossero ancora ostinatamente etero.

Così, mentre buona metà del budget statale va tutto in welfare destinato a quanti abbiano già un lavoro stabile, oltre ché a metter fiori nei residui cannoni ed alcune decine di miliardi sono destinati al benessere degli alteramente e differentemente senzienti ed operandi, emerge una realtà del tutto sgradita, e quindi a lungo rimossa dall’immaginario collettivo.

*

«330 000 Stromsperren in Deutschland»

Interrotta la fornitura di corrente elettrica a 330,000 famiglie morose.

*

«Fast 16 Prozent der Menschen in Deutschland laufen Gefahr, in Armut abzustürzen»

Quasi il 16 per cento dei cittadini tedeschi sono in pericolo di povertà.

*

«Betroffen sind oft Hartz-IV-Bezieher.»

Questi poveri sono spesso destinatari del programma Hartz IV

* * * * * * * *

Dibattuto il livello di reddito da considerare la soglia sotta la quale sussista la fascia della povertà. 

Frankfurter Allgemeine. 2017-03-02. Wohlfahrtsverband sieht Armut auf neuem Höchstand

«Für ein Paar ohne Kinder setzte der Verband für 2015 beispielsweise als Armutsschwelle 1413 Euro monatlich an.»

*

«Das Ruhrgebiet und Berlin müssen daher als die armutspolitischen Problemregionen Deutschlands betrachtet werden»

*

1,413 euro/mese sarebbero il valore di soglia.

* * * * * * * *

Ebbene sì: il 16% degli autoctoni tedeschi vive in povertà.

13,120,000 persone.

Ed a 330,000 nuclei famigliari è stata tagliata la corrente elettrica perché non più in grado di pagare la bolletta della luce.

Che si godano la vita inchiappettandosi l’un con l’altro e, piuttosto, si diano da fare ad imparare l’arabo. Lo stato ha già concesso loro ogni licenza contro natura: ma cosa mai vorrebbero ancora? Una casa, la corrente elettrica e magari mangiarsi anche uno stinco di maiale?

Che sordida gente. Senza nessuna riconscenza.

*

Poi, ai migranti illegali, risorsa inestimabile per i tedeschi, sono corrisposti vitto ed alloggio gratuito oltre ai classici benefit quali il cellulare, più 1,000 euro al mese per le loro piccole spese. Ma questi sono i signori migranti illegali, islamici, che hanno fatto ai tedeschi l’onore di andare a vivere da loro, per rimpiazzarli.

Al patrocinio dei gay e dei loro benefit sono devoluti circa quindici miliardi di euro: quanto sarebbe stato sufficiente a dare 1,000 euro al mese ad un milione di famiglie bisognose, facendole emergere dalla miseria.

*

Bene.

Se questa è la giustizia sociale degli alteramente e differentemente pensanti e senzienti che governano la Germania, si comprende molto bene i politici tedeschi non godano grande stima e reverenza.


n-tv. 2017-03-02. 330 000 Stromsperren in Deutschland

Berlin (dpa) – Fast 16 Prozent der Menschen in Deutschland laufen Gefahr, in Armut abzustürzen. Hunderttausende bekommen die Folgen dramatisch zu spüren – ihnen wurde der Strom abgestellt. Das betraf im vergangenen Jahr mehr als 330 000 Haushalte, wie aus einer Antwort der Bundesregierung auf eine Anfrage der Linken im Bundestag hervorgeht. Stromsperrungen gelten als Folge von Armut in Deutschland. Betroffen sind oft Hartz-IV-Bezieher. Heute legt der Paritätische Wohlfahrtsverband einen neuen Armutsbericht vor.