«In a ruling issued Thursday, Judges Kim Wardlaw and Ronald Gould of the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit said that the Trump administration did not release enough documents in response to lawsuits challenging the decision to end the program to paint a clear picture of its reasoning.»
«The Justice Department argued that U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup’s order to release more documents would violate executive privileges. That argument, however, was rebuffed by the 9th Circuit panel.»
The United States Courts of the Ninth Circuit ha dedicato un intera pagina internet al problema:
«On September 5, 2017, the Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Elaine Duke, announced the end of DHS’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy (“DACA”), effective March 5, 2018. Begun in 2012, DACA provided deferred action for certain individuals without lawful immigration status who had entered the United States as children. Several sets of plaintiffs sued to enjoin the rescission of DACA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and under various constitutional theories not relevant here.»
«We are not unmindful of the separation-of-powers concerns raised by the government.»
Ma la Corte del Nono Circuito se ne è fatta un baffo a torciglione. I giudici liberal sono una contraddizione vivente. Nel loro modo di concepire la “separation-of-powers” i giudici debbono fare politica, se questa è liberal, mentre l’esecutivo deve ben guardarsi anche solo dall’eprimere commenti. Sono i due pesi e le due misure che li rendono invisi.
Il problema è che la Corte Federale del 9° Circuito è composta per la maggior parte da giudici liberal democratici, che usano il loro ruolo come mazza ferrata per ingerirsi nella gestione politica, dimentichi dei risultati elettorali.
Si noti soltanto la fulminea rapidità: ricevuta l’istanza il 5 settembre, la Corte è riuscita ad andare in sentenza il 16 novembre: due mesi contro i tre anni medi. Mica male.
Nota. Gli Stati Uniti non avranno pace fino a tanto che i liberal democratici non saranno stati scacciati da qualsiasi posto di potere. Usano le corti di giustizia così come le usavano tutte le dittature del secolo passato.
The Trump administration plans to ask the Supreme Court to take up a case regarding the release of documents pertaining to President Trump’s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, Politico reported Friday.
The decision to seek relief from the nation’s highest court comes after a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Justice Department’s attempt to stop a federal judge’s order to release emails, memos and other documents considered part of Trump’s decision to end the program.
Trump announced in September that he would end the Obama-era program, which offered a temporary reprieve from deportation to hundreds of thousands of young undocumented immigrants brought to the country illegally as children.
That decision prompted public furor, as well as calls for lawmakers to take swift action to enshrine DACA’s protections into law.
In a ruling issued Thursday, Judges Kim Wardlaw and Ronald Gould of the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit said that the Trump administration did not release enough documents in response to lawsuits challenging the decision to end the program to paint a clear picture of its reasoning.
The Justice Department argued that U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup’s order to release more documents would violate executive privileges. That argument, however, was rebuffed by the 9th Circuit panel.
The administration was given until Nov. 22 to release an augmented administrative record of its DACA decision.
In a filing obtained by Politico on Friday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to stay the lower court’s decision.
«A long and painful downturn fanned separatist sentiment in Catalonia, which, contrary to predictions, didn’t die down with the recovery.»
«At some point the economic considerations start to be irrelevant and identity becomes paramount»
Tratti caratteristici dell’ideologia liberal e di quella socialista, non a caso provengono dalla stessa identica matrice culturale e politica, sono la concezione della persona umana in termini meramente economici e la necessità di giustificare la propria esistenza come contrapposizione ad un passato da rigettarsi in toto.
Questi due assiomi, perché come tali sono assunti, sono stati ben sintetizzati da Herr Schulz un due frasi lapidarie:
e, diciamolo francamente, Herr Schulz è un ottimo rappresentante del socialismo ideologico.
Questa concezione, meglio, questa Weltanschauung, ha improntato la cultura e la politica mondiale occidentale fino a tanto che liberal negli Stati Uniti e socialisti in Europa erano al governo. L’Unione Europea è una loro replica che ne assume tutti i contenuti.
Ma i tempi sono mutati. I liberal democratici hanno perso le elezioni negli Stati Uniti, i socialisti sono stati annientati in Francia ed in Germania hanno preso una batosta stramazzante. Restano ancora in piedi cascami dell’antico potere: potenti, ancora molto potenti, ma con il destino segnato dall’evolversi dei tempi.
In questa situazione si svolgono i fatti della Catalogna.
Liberal e socialisti si stupiscono di due fatti:
– il separatismo non è scemato nonostante i segni di ripresa economica;
– le considerazioni economiche sono irrilevanti mentre l’identità nazionale assume veste gigantesca.
I fatti stanno smentendo i postulati alla base dell’ideologia libera e socialista.
«It appeared that Enric Millo, the Spanish government’s representative in Catalonia, might have been right when he predicted in 2012 that once removed from the flame of financial crisis, “separatism would sink like a soufflé.”»
Nemmeno per ridere!
Predizione errata perché basata su assiomi di partenza errati.
Eppure, la guerra civile di devoluzione della Yugoslavia avrebbe ben dovuto essere una severa lezione. I popoli sono abbarbicati alle proprie tradizioni.
Ora il Governo Rajoy ha fatto intervenire la polizia, in un domani farà intervenire l’esercito.
«Acting on his orders, Spanish police used batons and rubber bullets against those who took part in an Oct. 1 referendum on independence that Spain’s constitutional court had declared illegal. Hundreds were injured in the melees»
Nulla di nuovo sotto il sole. Manganelli e proiettili di gomma, quindi proiettili veri e geurra civile.
Anche l’Unione Sovietica represse nel sangue la rivolta ungherese prima e quindi quella cecoslovacca.
È solo questione di tempo e, non ci si faccia illusioni, ma proprio nessuna.
Molte altre regioni di Europa sono in subbuglio, ed i paesi dell’est mal sopportano l’usbergo di Bruxelles.
Senza più il Regno Unito, con una Francia azzoppata e con la Germania senza Governo l’utopia di uno stato europeo a stampo liberal è svanita.
Ci si prepari. Come per la Yugoslavia anche in Europa le guerre civili potrebbero ritornare, e ritornare anche con inusitata violenza. Le identità nazionali alla fine prevalgono su tutto.
I problemi politici, specie quelli identitari, che non siano risolti in via politica sfociano inevitabilmente in conflitti armati.
Ma poniamoci allora dei quesiti.
Il Governo Rajoy sarebbe forte a sufficienza da contrastare le ambizioni della Catalogna?
La Commissione Europea è forte a sufficienza da intervenire con autorità impositiva in Spagna?
Barcelona and Madrid survived the tough times together, but even as Spain’s economy improves, their union is disintegrating.
As recently as July, secessionists in Catalonia seemed to be in retreat. Spain was the fastest-growing of continental Europe’s big four economies, creating jobs at a rapid clip. A poll that month by the Catalan government showed that support for independence had fallen to 35 percent, its lowest level since 2012. It appeared that Enric Millo, the Spanish government’s representative in Catalonia, might have been right when he predicted in 2012 that once removed from the flame of financial crisis, “separatism would sink like a soufflé.”
What’s sinking instead is the reputation of Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy. Acting on his orders, Spanish police used batons and rubber bullets against those who took part in an Oct. 1 referendum on independence that Spain’s constitutional court had declared illegal. Hundreds were injured in the melees.
The Catalan government claimed that despite Madrid’s attempts at suppression, 2.3 million people voted—about 42 percent of the total electorate—and about 90 percent of them chose to separate from Spain. The Spanish government cast doubt on the result, pointing out that the referendum, in addition to being illegal, lacked certified voter lists and wasn’t overseen by an official election board. And many of those who opposed secession heeded Madrid’s reminder that the vote was illegal. Spain’s King Felipe VI said in a televised address that separatist leaders showed “unacceptable” disloyalty.
The groundswell of separatist sentiment in Catalonia has shown Spain and the world that money isn’t everything. A strengthening economy may have quelled Catalan nationalism a bit, but the desire many have for independence had deeper sources and never went away. Then Rajoy, playing to his conservative base, badly miscalculated. He thought a show of force would keep voters at home. But his attempt to stop the vote just pushed more Catalans into the separatist camp. “In the longer term, the divisions in Spain become more entrenched,” says Antonio Barroso, a political risk analyst at Teneo Intelligence in London.
Economics probably did matter in Catalonia, just not in the way that Spanish optimists were thinking. The reality is that the region hasn’t fully recovered from the global financial crisis, which pushed the economy into a double-dip recession and sent unemployment in the so-called autonomous community as high as 24 percent. (It’s still more than 13 percent.) “The financial crisis brought to the fore the fact that so much of our money is transferred” to the central government, says Jordi Galí of Barcelona’s Center for Research in International Economics, known by its initials in the Catalan language, CREI. “In a context of high growth and prosperity, this may be more easily forgotten. But during the crisis the Catalan government had to undertake huge cuts in services: health, education.”
The transfers issue might not have been enough to stir secessionism all by itself. After all, there’s little call in Connecticut to break away from the U.S. even though the state gives more than it gets. The difference is that the northeastern corner of Spain has its own language, traditions, and aspirations to national greatness. Its history is a seesaw of autonomy and what some see as subjugation. Catalans still commemorate the fall of Barcelona to King Philip V of Spain on Sept. 11, 1714. In 1939 the city fell to the Nationalist forces of Francisco Franco, who suppressed Catalan culture during his 36-year rule.
In recent years, independence-minded Catalans have focused their anger on a 2010 ruling by Spain’s constitutional court that erased parts of a legislative deal that accorded the region broad autonomy. In 2012 the Catalan economist Xavier Sala-I-Martin likened Spain to a possessive husband who reacts wildly when his wife asks for a divorce. “We Catalans have tried to explain during 30 years that we were uncomfortable and the replies have been no’s, scorn, indifference, and contempt. And now they’re surprised!” the Columbia University professor wrote on his blog.
The marriage is far worse now. “People are extremely disappointed, and I would say shocked, by the activities of the Spanish police,” says Giacomo Ponzetto, an Italian who teaches at CREI in Barcelona. “It was absurd, unacceptable behavior, and I would add extremely stupid.” Stupid as in self-defeating, he says. “The Catalan government was looking for this. It’s very obvious. They wanted to provoke a response.”
Like it or not, Catalonia has been very much part of Spain—not least because it’s a fifth of the national economy. It exports more to the neighboring region of Aragon than to France, and more to Madrid than to Germany or Italy, says Pankaj Ghemawat, who teaches at the New York City branch of IESE Business School, which also has campuses in Madrid and Barcelona.
Many economists think Catalonia would be worse off economically on its own. The outcome hinges on whether it would assume a share of Spain’s national debt, whether it would be permitted to join the European Union and adopt the euro, and how much it would cost to replicate services—such as defense—it gets from Madrid. Further complicating matters, Spain could throw up legal obstacles to secession. One reason many Catalans have shied from independence in the past is that they weren’t ready to take a leap into the unknown.
But the violence that marred the Oct. 1 vote has focused Catalans’ minds on issues other than euros. “At some point the economic considerations start to be irrelevant and identity becomes paramount,” says Ghemawat. On Oct. 1, he says, “we took a giant step in that direction.”