Pubblicato in: Devoluzione socialismo, Unione Europea

Unione Europea. L’arroganza elitaria la danneggia. – Cnn.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2018-06-07.

superbia1

Treccani ben definisce il termine arroganza:

«il comportamento altezzoso, sprezzante e talora violento che spesso caratterizza chi detiene il potere …. insolenza e asprezza di modi di chi, presumendo troppo di sé, vuol far sentire la sua superiorità».

Similmente, Treccani interpreta il termine “presunzione” in questo modo:

«Fiducia eccessiva nelle proprie capacità, alta ed esagerata opinione di sé, con riferimento a un comportamento particolare e determinato».

In realtà, volendo mettere l’ascia alla radice, il vero problema è quello della superbia:

«una considerazione talmente alta di sé stessi da giungere al punto di stimarsi come principio e fine del proprio essere»

Un discorso a parte sarebbe quello dell’élite.

I liberal ed i socialisti ideologizzati si autodefiniscono “élite“, ma tutti gli altri non riconoscono loro questo appellativo. Poi, questa che si definisce élite, quale potere decisionale effettivo ha, in cosa domina?

Le elezioni presidenziali americane hanno distrutto i liberal democratici e la superba Mrs Hillay Clinton, il 24 settembre ha spezzato le gambe al governo di Frau Merkel, le elezioni in Ungheria e nella Repubblica Cecka hanno rigettato le loro tesi, ed i risultati delle elezioni politiche in Italia dovrebbero essere ben chiari: gli Elettori di loro non ne vogliono più sapere.

Mai chi mai si credono di essere i liberal socialisti?

Loro e la loro arroganza elitaria sono diventati minoranza, e proprio non sanno perdere.

*

Questo articolo comparso su Cnn è di rara acutezza, specie poi tenendo conto della testata.

«Elitist arrogance in Brussels could tear the EU apart»

*

«At a time when the European Union is mired in crisis, its proponents would be advised to look beyond the clichés of the intolerant, quarrelsome Central Europeans in its ranks and not dismiss their concerns about the future of the union»

*

«Their gripes — although not necessarily their conclusions — are, in large, legitimate and could rip the EU apart if they’re not addressed»

*

«The countries of the “new East bloc” don’t just butt heads with the EU on specific issues such as energy and immigration; they profess a rival big-frame vision for the future: a loosely aligned “Europe of nations.”»

*

«And they staunchly oppose the kind of “multi-speed EU” propagated by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.»

*

«But a closer look reveals a more subtle frustration with the EU than that gleaned from populist politicos such as Hungary’s Viktor Orban and Poland’s Jarosław Kaczyński.»

*

«To begin with, even Central Europe’s loudest demagogues, aren’t “anti-EU” as much as they are “anti-Brussels,” which implies specific disagreements with current EU policies, not the EU.»

*

«In terms of the economy, EU membership has created considerable wealth for many in Central Europe, but its woefully unequal distribution in these countries discredits the EU in large swaths of the populations. …. Much of the profit of Western-owned firms leaves the country altogether»

*

«Progressive left-wing parties are striking absent from the political landscape.»

*

«As for EU democracy, the Central Europeans rightly feel excluded from decision-making processes that are dominated by the bigger, wealthier Western countries»

*

«The EU’s democracy deficits are gaping in the first place»

*

«The EU’s processes are opaque, and the biggest decisions are made behind closed doors.»

*

«The Western countries often act as if the Central Europeans are fortunate just to sit at the table with the grown-ups»

*

«We have to remember that only when Western Europe’s postwar economies stabilized did “post-material” values, such as gender equality, self-expression and environmentalism, become serious issues»

*

«Tragically, the animosity between the Central Europeans and the EU looks only to worsen.»

*

«Berlin and Paris believe that they will chart the course, and the rest will follow. But if this is the terms of reform, one day the Westerners might wake up to find that the followers have opted for their own path.»

* * * * * * * *

La lettura di questo articolo evidenzia quanto grande mutamento abbia fatto Cnn.

«not dismiss their concerns about the future of the union … “Europe of nations.” …. aren’t “anti-EU” as much as they are “anti-Brussels,” …. which implies specific disagreements with current EU policies, not the EU.»

*

Ma forse ciò che più lascia stupiti, ed a quanto ci risulterebbe sarebbe la prima ammissione da parte di ambienti liberal, è il prendere atto di quanto il tentativo di imporre la propria visione etica abbia concorso a generare una reazione rigida e severa.

Si dovrebbe fare una ultima considerazione.

In un sistema democratico la maggioranza non dovrebbe essere arrogante né ritenersi l’unico punto di vista accettabile, ed il fatto che vi sia una minoranza che non lo condivide dovrebbe essere visto non tanto come una eresia, quanto piuttosto come una posizione politica, sociale ed economica da valorizzare.

*

Juncker: Italians need to work harder and be less corrupt [The Guardian]

Juncker prompts Italian ire with ‘more work’ jibe [Politico]

‘Work HARDER!’ EU’s Juncker attacks Italy in crazy rant as bloc relations hit CRISIS POINT [Sunday Express]

Jean-Claude Juncker apologises for remarks suggesting that southern Italy is corrupt and lazy [The Telegraph]

*

Concludiamo con il twitter del prof. Krugman, il premio Nobel per l’economia, portavoce per l’economia dei liberal democratici.

«This is really awful: you don’t have to like the populist parties who won a clear electoral mandate to be appalled at the attempt to exclude them from power because they want a eurosceptic finance minister»

*

«Faith in the single currency trumps democracy? Really? European institutions already suffering lack of legitimacy due to democratic deficit. This will make things much worse»


Cnn. 2018-02-14. Elitist arrogance in Brussels could tear the EU apart

(CNN)At a time when the European Union is mired in crisis, its proponents would be advised to look beyond the clichés of the intolerant, quarrelsome Central Europeans in its ranks and not dismiss their concerns about the future of the union.

Their gripes — although not necessarily their conclusions — are, in large, legitimate and could rip the EU apart if they’re not addressed.

At first glance, it’s hard to grasp why Central Europe has become the EU’s problem child — as evidenced in its euroskeptic leaderships in countries such as Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic.

So stridently has Poland’s ultra-conservative leadership bucked EU norms by tampering with its judiciary, for example, that Brussels has begun legal proceedings against it — a first in EU history — which could deprive Warsaw of its voting rights in EU bodies. But Warsaw swears it won’t budge.

The countries of the “new East bloc” don’t just butt heads with the EU on specific issues such as energy and immigration; they profess a rival big-frame vision for the future: a loosely aligned “Europe of nations.”

And they staunchly oppose the kind of “multi-speed EU” propagated by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Their pique, though, is hard to fathom looking just at selective figures. The region’s economies from the Baltics to the western Balkans are experiencing their steepest growth since the 2008-9 global financial crisis, enabled in large part by 180 billion euros (about $220 billion) of EU financial transfers scheduled for 2014 to 2020.

Poland’s economy is so robust that it barely hiccuped during the Great Recession. National incomes are significantly higher than when most of the Central Europeans entered the EU in the 2000s, and unemployment is lower than ever, too.

Moreover, surveys show that ordinary Poles and Hungarians — in fact the entire region — overwhelmingly favor EU membership. In the most disenchanted nation, Slovakia, 70% of Slovaks are positive about the EU, a 2017 survey finds.

But a closer look reveals a more subtle frustration with the EU than that gleaned from populist politicos such as Hungary’s Viktor Orban and Poland’s Jarosław Kaczyński.

To begin with, even Central Europe’s loudest demagogues, aren’t “anti-EU” as much as they are “anti-Brussels,” which implies specific disagreements with current EU policies, not the EU.

And this is understandable, and legitimate: The EU has many deep-seated flaws, which even its advocates acknowledge — although they play down their reservations for fear of further tarnishing the EU’s image.

In terms of the economy, EU membership has created considerable wealth for many in Central Europe, but its woefully unequal distribution in these countries discredits the EU in large swaths of the populations. The largesse from EU funds and the neoliberal transitions to market economies has gone disproportionately to urban centers, the highly educated and mobile, western regions, and younger people. Much of the profit of Western-owned firms leaves the country altogether.

Booming downtown Warsaw with its yuppie bars is no reflection of the conditions in depopulated rural Poland, where risk of poverty is almost twice as high as in cities.

This is where much of the national populists’ support hails — across the region. Earlier this month, the votes of poorer, older and rural voters, mostly without higher education, boosted EU skeptic Milos Zeman into the Czech presidency over his liberal challenger, an urbane, pro-EU university professor.

“In Central Europe, the EU hasn’t put nearly enough emphasis on internal imbalances within countries,” explains Hungarian economist Laszlo Andor, who was Hungary’s EU commissioner from 2010 to 2014. “The East-West divide in economic opportunities and social equality in countries like Hungary, Poland and Slovakia is reflected in a divided political map.”

Indeed, borderless free trade — one of the EU’s key selling points — has hurt those beyond the hubs of prosperity, especially in agriculture, who find it difficult or impossible to compete with EU trade-zone imports.

The national populists take aim at the neoliberal economics that they claim are embedded in the EU’s DNA. What they offer however — clientelism and protectionism — is no real option for economic success. Central Europe’s mainstream political parties, which are considered the champions of the market economies that they put in place in the 1990s and 2000s, have paid for the fallout at the ballot box. Progressive left-wing parties are striking absent from the political landscape.

As for EU democracy, the Central Europeans rightly feel excluded from decision-making processes that are dominated by the bigger, wealthier Western countries. The EU’s democracy deficits are gaping in the first place — for all of its 510 million citizens.

But for the smaller, poorer countries, like most of the Central Europeans, they loom even larger. They have scant means to affect policies when Germany and France team up with each other. The EU’s processes are opaque, and the biggest decisions are made behind closed doors.

The Western countries often act as if the Central Europeans are fortunate just to sit at the table with the grown-ups. They shouldn’t be complaining about the fare. This arrogance in Brussels has finally gotten under their skin after years of silently enduring it — and populists exploit this resentment to the fullest.

Of course, the Central Europeans are increasingly unhappy — and vocal — about the liberal cultural manifesto that came with their EU entry — the fine print, as they saw it when they signed up.

Yet tolerance of homosexuality, for example, or other civil rights issues didn’t manifest themselves as from-below social movements in Central Europe as they did in Western Europe in the 1970s, and gradually, over decades, become the norm.

We have to remember that only when Western Europe’s postwar economies stabilized did “post-material” values, such as gender equality, self-expression and environmentalism, become serious issues — and then were institutionalized piecemeal over the course of years with conservatives fighting them every step of the way.

This is no excuse for discrimination, for example of the Roma people or gay people, or the rejection of immigration, which is currently at the crux of tensions. These are fundamental rights at the heart of the EU project.

But perhaps the Central Europeans should be measured in terms of their progress in the right direction, rather than the current state of affairs. The tragedy is that there won’t be any progress with blinkered nationalists in power. But this vicious circle will become all the harder to break, the longer the status quo prevails.

Tragically, the animosity between the Central Europeans and the EU looks only to worsen.

Macron and Merkel, as just about everyone in the EU, realize that the EU needs fixing. But the plan to create faster and slower tracks for countries on different issues will only further empower the larger Western countries at the expense of the smaller ones.

Berlin and Paris believe that they will chart the course, and the rest will follow. But if this is the terms of reform, one day the Westerners might wake up to find that the followers have opted for their own path.

 

Annunci

Un pensiero riguardo “Unione Europea. L’arroganza elitaria la danneggia. – Cnn.

I commenti sono chiusi.