Pubblicato in: Criminalità Organizzata, Devoluzione socialismo, Unione Europea

EU ha truffato per centinaia di miliardi i paesi dell’est, che si sono incazzati.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-12-18.

Unione Europea Eurpa 001

L’Unione Europea è celebre al mondo per il suo overkilling normativo. C’è una normativa per tutto. La normativa sulla coltivazione delle melanzane occupa diciassette volumi di circa mille pagine l’uno, mentre quella sulla coltivazione delle zucchine supera a stento le ottomila.

Dispone anche di uno sterminato esercito di funzionari che sorvegliano che tali regolamenti e norme siano applicati alla lettera, pena severissime multe e l’ostracismo politico.

Se però, se però….

Se però si fosse amici degli amici, allora i regolamenti servirebbero per quelli che proprio non sanno come regolarsi.

E gli amici sanno benissimo come regolarsi.

La storia è lungo e risale ai primi anni del novanta, al crollo dell’Unione Sovietica.

«[Fico] was speaking for 103 million EU citizens who for years have been forced to make due with second-rate versions of brand-name products»

*

«The Polish newspaper Gazeta Prawna has referred to the phenomenon as “grocery racism.”»

*

«One test showed that a package of fish sticks sold in Slovakia contained just 58 percent fish whereas a package purchased across the border in Austria included 65 percent fish»

*

«When it came to the bottle of Lenor fabric softener provided by Fico, it cost 30 cents more than in Austria and contained 60 milliliters less»

*

«In products like Coca-Cola, sugar is sometimes replaced with cheaper sweeteners like glucose syrup»

*

«For years, Frosta fish sticks produced in Poland were wrapped in a much thicker layer of breading»

*

«Tests have determined that Ferrero uses less cocoa powder in Hungary than it does in Germany»

* * * * *

Riassumendo.

103 milioni di Cittadini dell’Unione sui 500 milioni totali, il 20% circa, riceve sistematicamente prodotti alimentari che a parità di costo contengono un buon 10 – 15 % di ingredienti in meno.

Il tutto avviene contro le regole dell’Europa ma sotto il benevolo occhio di politici, eurocrati, burocrati e funzionari.

Non sappiamo quali ricompense siano dovute per tali servizi. Possiamo però stimare un “risparmio” a diverse centinaia di miliardi di euro ogni anno, e questo da quasi trenta anni.

*

«In the first years following the collapse of communism, the use of cheaper ingredients could perhaps have been justifiable: Consumers had little purchasing power and delivery routes tended to be long, with most of the products being manufactured in Western Europe»

*

«Companies, though, have long since adjusted prices in Eastern Europe to match those elsewhere – but they have continued to use the inferior recipes»

* * *

Se siamo perfettamente di accordo che agli inizi degli anni novanta i paesi dell’est europeo erano miseri, ma da oltre venti anni questa condizione è fortunatamente svanita.

«The European Commission in Brussels has been repeatedly informed of the fact that products sold under the same brand name sometimes contain different ingredients depending on where in Europe they are sold»

*

«But the EU executive body only got involved once several leading Eastern European politicians began focusing on the issue»

*

«This spring, the chief of staff to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán referred to the situation as “the biggest scandal of the recent past.” The Czech agricultural minister said it made people feel as though they were “Europe’s garbage can.”»

*

«European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker promised a bit of help in his September State of the Union address. And a first step was taken by European Justice and Consumers Commissioner Vera Jourová, who ordered an evaluation of tests that have been performed on products in various Eastern European countries. That evaluation found that Robert Fico may have been justified in the complaints he made back in July»

*

Se si potesse parlare come si mangia, si dovrebbe concludere che l’Unione Europea è solo una grandiosa associazione per delinquere.


Spiegel. 2017-12-13. Eastern Europeans Tire of Being Sold Inferior Products

Why does Nutella in Hungary contain less cocoa than the same chocolate spread in Germany? Why do fish sticks in Prague have less fish? Eastern European are tired of being served inferior products — and the EU is finally addressing the issue.

*

It was a mid-July day in Bratislava when Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico gave vent to his fury, pulling off his jacket and threatening to hand down sanctions. But his anger wasn’t directed at some tin-pot dictator. Rather, his tirade was focused on fish sticks from Iglo and fabric softener from Lenor. Those companies, Fico threatened, could find themselves boycotted if they continued to sell inferior products to the consumers of Eastern Europe.

His message could hardly have been clearer.

Fico, though, wasn’t speaking just for people in his own country. Rather, he was giving voice to those across Central and Eastern Europe who have long wondered why Nutella doesn’t taste as chocolatey at home as it does in Germany, for example, or why the cola isn’t as full-bodied and the washing powder doesn’t work as well.

He was speaking for 103 million EU citizens who for years have been forced to make due with second-rate versions of brand-name products. Not only that, but questionable studies have even claimed to show that Eastern European consumers prefer the mediocre goods to the real thing. The Polish newspaper Gazeta Prawna has referred to the phenomenon as “grocery racism.”

Fico’s mid-summer jeremiad was just the latest climax in an ongoing, potentially explosive conflict involving first- and second-class consumers. At issue is not just the question as to why large companies dump apparently inferior products onto the Eastern European market, thus “defrauding” millions of consumers, as Slovakian Agricultural Minister Gabriela Matecná puts it. It is also about the European Union’s commitment to unity and whether that commitment should extend to the recipes used by Nutella.

The European Commission in Brussels has been repeatedly informed of the fact that products sold under the same brand name sometimes contain different ingredients depending on where in Europe they are sold. But the EU executive body only got involved once several leading Eastern European politicians began focusing on the issue. This spring, the chief of staff to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán referred to the situation as “the biggest scandal of the recent past.” The Czech agricultural minister said it made people feel as though they were “Europe’s garbage can.”

Justified Complaints

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker promised a bit of help in his September State of the Union address. And a first step was taken by European Justice and Consumers Commissioner Vera Jourová, who ordered an evaluation of tests that have been performed on products in various Eastern European countries. That evaluation found that Robert Fico may have been justified in the complaints he made back in July.

One test showed that a package of fish sticks sold in Slovakia contained just 58 percent fish whereas a package purchased across the border in Austria included 65 percent fish. When it came to the bottle of Lenor fabric softener provided by Fico, it cost 30 cents more than in Austria and contained 60 milliliters less. In other products, more expensive ingredients like butter have been replaced by cheaper palm oil for the Eastern European market while fruit flavors are augmented by aromas. In products like Coca-Cola, sugar is sometimes replaced with cheaper sweeteners like glucose syrup.

In the first years following the collapse of communism, the use of cheaper ingredients could perhaps have been justifiable: Consumers had little purchasing power and delivery routes tended to be long, with most of the products being manufactured in Western Europe. Companies, though, have long since adjusted prices in Eastern Europe to match those elsewhere – but they have continued to use the inferior recipes. Armin Valet, an expert on grocery products for the consumer protection agency in Hamburg, estimates that selling inferior products saves companies millions.

Commissioner Jourová has now assembled an investigative committee which is to develop guidelines together with consumer protection groups and food manufacturers to address the issue. It’s not a particularly powerful lever, but the companies do seem concerned about more radical steps. A steady stream of companies and lobbying groups have been approaching Jourová and her team.

Unfair Commercial Practice

Whether their solicitation efforts are successful will be seen in how willing the Commission ultimately proves to be in granting concessions. One specific area to watch is the EU’s evaluation of industry studies pertaining to alleged regional preferences. In the future, companies that are unable to adequately explain why they use differing recipes could face proceedings for unfair commercial practices.

Past attempts by companies to explain the discrepancies have been prime examples of PR balderdash, including claims that they were simply trying to use local products or account for local tastes and preferences. In other words, skimping on premium ingredients was merely an expression of intercultural understanding. In the future, the Commission will demand convincing proof of the differences in taste between Eastern and Western Europe. To date, none has been provided.

Instead, many companies prefer to hide behind formulaic statements and continue to reject all accusations of any wrongdoing. Industry lobbying groups have likewise sought to cast doubt on the studies that have found recipe discrepancies.

But Bahlsen, the manufacturer of the popular sweet biscuits under the Leibniz brand, has taken a different tack. Recently, the company fixed a discrepancy between the recipe it was using in Germany and the recipe it was using in Poland. Company spokesman Christian Bahlmann says that he began suspecting an approaching PR disaster for the company in summer 2016. “It began relatively quietly on social media channels,” he says. Customers were asking why Leibniz biscuits baked in the company’s Polish factory contained less butter and more palm oil than those produced in Germany. And the company did not have a satisfactory answer.

Bahlmann realized that it could become a problem for the brand. After all, the recipe for the sweet biscuits had been around since 1891. Suddenly diluting it with palm oil looked extremely suspicious. But in July, Bahlsen reversed course and has been using exclusively butter since then — in its Polish factory as well.

Cheaper Production

Another company that has elected to buck the industry-wide trend of denial is Frosta, a Hamburg-based frozen food company. Felix Ahlers, whose family runs the company, has chosen not to try to use the “national preferences” excuse cited by Iglo, its main competitor. “There is only one reason to use less fish,” Ahlers says. “To make production cheaper.”

For years, Frosta fish sticks produced in Poland were wrapped in a much thicker layer of breading. But the company fixed the inconsistency a year and a half ago. In contrast to Germany and Austria, there are no laws in Poland that required Frosta to make the change, but Ahlers says it was an issue of credibility. “The argument about regional tastes is nonsense,” he says. It isn’t difficult, he says, to condition children to prefer more breading. “But really, everybody wants more fish in their product,” he says. And tests undertaken by Frosta, he says, have shown that Polish consumers prefer the new recipe.

Still, many companies continue to insist that it makes sense to have different recipes for different countries. A spokeswoman for the SPAR supermarket chain in Austria made clear that the company doesn’t believe products should contain exactly the same ingredients across Europe. The yoghurt sold by SPAR in Eastern Europe, for example, has less fruit in it than the same yoghurt — packaged under a virtually identical label – sold in Austria, according to a test performed by the Slovenian consumer protection organization ZPS. Furthermore, the fish sticks sold under SPAR’s own brand name are fattier and more expensive in Eastern Europe.

The spokeswoman justified the discrepancies by citing alleged differences in taste – and by reviving a few outmoded, postwar clichés. Hungarians, she claimed, demand “rather fatty meat.” That, she continued, is something known by all industry experts. “It’s not something you need a study for.”

The company also seems rather flexible on other issues as well. In 2011, the company set a goal for itself of only using fish from sustainable sources and catch methods starting in 2013. But that doesn’t seem to apply to Eastern Europe. Indeed, the Marine Stewardship Council certification seal is missing from many of the company’s fish products in the region. In Slovenia, the spokeswoman said, most consumers aren’t particularly concerned about sustainability.

Ripping Them Off?

The American consumer goods corporation Procter & Gamble — which owns the brands Gillette, Lenor and Pampers, among many others — is much more rigorous when it comes to determining the predilections of its customers, with a company spokeswoman claiming that it performs 20,000 studies each year. One finding she mentioned as an example is that Poles prefer squirting dishwashing liquid directly onto the sponge rather than using a sink filled with soapy water, as the Germans prefer.

So is the company giving Poles what they want by using a more diluted mixture than that sold in Germany? Or is it simply ripping them off?

Tests that are pointed to as proof of alleged national differences are often commissioned from the Appliance Technology department at the University of Bonn. One of the studies undertaken by the department is called “Washing-up Behaviour and Techniques in Europe,” and as part of the study, 11 test subjects from Poland and the Czech Republic were questioned, apparently by telephone. Hardly a representative study.

Chocolate multinational Ferrero likewise serves up some rather strange answers when questioned about the different recipes for its famous hazelnut-chocolate spread Nutella. Tests have determined that Ferrero uses less cocoa powder in Hungary than it does in Germany and the company has sought to justify the discrepancy with “the availability of resources.” The explanation makes it sound like cocoa is first delivered to Germany and then Hungary has to make due with whatever is left over. But Ferrero also points to “national regulations,” even though there is no regulation anywhere in Eastern Europe that requires the company to use less cocoa in Nutella sold there.

Ferrero executives have presented an additional curious explanation to European commissioner Jourová. The amount of cocoa used in Germany, they said, is slightly higher to make the consistency of the Nutella sold there thicker because Germans tend to use denser, whole-grain breads. Ferrero has yet to submit a study to back up the claim.

Destroying Brands

It is enough to make one wonder what such companies are thinking. They are, it would seem, putting the reputation of their most important brand names at stake.

“It is astounding how amateurishly these multinationals are acting,” says Achim Feige from BrandTrust, a brand consultancy. At a time when brand loyalty is eroding and store brands are on the rise, Feige says, a product must be extremely reliable, like a good friend, and guarantee transparency and verifiable sustainability. “These executives are doing the opposite: They are destroying a brand from the inside out by using inferior, cheaper versions for other countries and by relying on even less convincing excuses. They are allowing for fraud. And they are sacrificing the idea of a united Europe to the greed for profits.”

Nowhere is the problem more visible than at Danone, the Paris-based food-products corporation (sold as Dannon in the United States). For years, the company has been severely criticized for high sugar content in its products, among other shortcomings. Recently though, the company has sought to demonstrate responsiveness to such concerns and in June, CEO Emmanuel Faber called for a “food revolution” at an industry conference.

Faber failed to clarify exactly what role his company planned to play in this revolution. He did, however, mention “social responsibility” and unveiled the company’s new logo: “One Planet. One Health.”

But his company’s commitment to social responsibility doesn’t seem to extend into Eastern Europe. Danone’s bestselling Activia brand, sold in the same packaging worldwide since 2016, tastes quite a bit different in the region when compared to the same product sold further to the west. And a test conducted in Lithuania shows why that is: The amount of fruit used in the product was quite a bit lower than in Western Europe. And the strawberry yogurt also contained a thickener.

Annunci

Un pensiero riguardo “EU ha truffato per centinaia di miliardi i paesi dell’est, che si sono incazzati.

I commenti sono chiusi.