Giuseppe Sandro Mela.
Ricordiamo come il Deutsche Welle sia l’organo ufficioso di stampa del Governo tedesco, edito in trenta lingue tranne che in italiano, con redattori specchiatamente socialdemocratici: nel suo “about us” si dichiara apertamente ‘liberal‘. Diamo atto alla chiarezza: non cerca in nulla di mimetizzarsi.
Negli ultimi tempi, chiusa la via balcanica ai migranti, si è assistito ad un’ondata migratoria dalla Libia verso l’Italia.
In una prima fase i migranti erano trasportati con mezzi di fortuna fino alle coste italiane, in una seconda invece si sono presentate navi di proprietà oppure noleggiate da ong, organizzazioni non governative, che li raccoglievano financo dentro le acque territoriali libiche, per portarli poi in Italia. Ovviamente, vi erano eccezioni, e la Marina Militare italiana ha svolto il compito umanitario di raccogliere i profughi in acqua.
Dai dati statistici forniti, la maggior parte di questi migranti non erano nella condizione di chiedere asilo politico, non erano quindi potenziali rifugiati: erano da annoverarsi tra i migranti economici, ossia persone in cerca di migliori possibilità e condizioni di vita.
Tuttavia, l’Unione Europea non ha mai consentito che i migranti sbarcati in Italia potessero essere ripartiti in altri paesi dell’Unione. Francia e Germania si erano sempre opposte.
La situazione è diventata talmente tesa che alla fine anche il Governo Gentiloni ha perso la pazienza:
ove il termine ‘nuclear option‘ indica il rilascio di visto temporaneo di immigrazione, azione che avrebbe permesso di incanalare legalmente i migranti arrivati negli altri paesi dell’Unione.
La reazione dell’Unione Europea è stata drastica quanto rapidissima: se a parole approvano e facilitano l’immigrazione illegale, nei fatti la guardano come la peste bubbonica.
Per facilitare la comprensione del fenomeno, riportiamo a seguito lo sviluppo temporale dei titoli del Deutsche Welle. Riportiamo l’intera storia citando una fonte sicuramente ‘liberal‘ e pro Unione Europea per evitare di essere accusati di aver fatto citazioni di parte e, quindi, a dire di alcuni Commentatori, faziose.
2017-06-30. Italy is running out of patience
2017-07-08. Dozens of migrants feared drowned off Libya
«In an attempt to stem rising migrant flows, the Italian government completed a draft code of conduct for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that carry out search and rescue missions in the Mediterranean Sea, an official said on Wednesday.
Italy’s 11-point plan reportedly includes new rules that would ban charity boats from making phone calls or firing flares that could signal to human traffickers that it was a good time to launch their migrant boats. The groups would also no longer be allowed to enter Libyan territorial waters.
Additionally, should any group refuse to accept the terms, they could be barred access to Italian ports, meaning the charity ships would have to divert to other countries to disembark refugees.
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (HRW) heavily criticized Italy’s plan on Wednesday after receiving a leaked draft of the code.»
Così si arriva all’annuncio di oggi.
«Senior Italian government figures have threatened to allow 200,000 migrants who have reached its shores to travel across Europe by exploiting a little-known Brussels directive as the country struggles to cope with a huge rise in refugees fleeing north Africa»
«A minister and a senator are plotting to issue migrants with temporary EU visas in a move that has been described as a “nuclear option” for solving Italy’s refugee crisis»
«Germany and Austria’s interior ministers have accused private initiatives to save refugees in the Mediterranean of intentionally working with people smugglers»
«The accusation has sparked outrage and may not even be true»
«Austrian Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka has called for legal “punishments” for NGO workers who pick migrants in danger of drowning out of the Mediterranean»
«We have to stop so-called helpers from entering Libyan waters and directly taking refugees from human traffickers …. It’s crucial that self-appointed emergency sea rescuers no longer cooperate with the [people smuggling] rings»
«Those sentiments were seconded, in less direct form, by Germany’s conservative Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere in a separate newspaper interview. He cited Italian accusations that NGO rescue boats concealed their transponder positions from coast guards and turned on their lights to give boatloads of refugees a “goal.”»
«We cannot exclude that organized crime gangs involved in migrant smuggling assume that migrants will be picked up by NGOs very close to the shore, rather than sail all the way to Italy and that the migrant smugglers take advantage of this»
«Statistics show that attempted crossings from northern Africa were on the rise before the increase in NGO activities»
«The human trafficking problem starts on land …. When the migrants are at sea, it’s already too late»
«Berlin (Reuters) – Bundesinnenminister Thomas de Maizière hat Kritik an den im Mittelmeer agierenden Hilfsorganisationen geübt.
Le navi Ong alterano i dati del transponder, al fine di non farsi localizzare.
* * * * * * *
È davvero molto forte la frase in cui i Ministri del Interni della Germania e dell’Austria accusano le organizzazioni non governative di lavorare “intenzionalmente” con i contrabbandieri: «of intentionally working with people smugglers»
«We have to stop so-called helpers from entering Libyan waters and directly taking refugees from human traffickers»
Se questo problema dovrebbe al momento essere ben chiaro, ne emergerebbe un altro, molto meno chiaro e verosimilmente ben più spinoso.
Tutte le Ong che operano sulle coste libiche nella tratta degli esseri umani fanno capo a Mr. Soros ed ai liberals democratici americani.
A questo atteggiamento fa riscontro la ferma opposizione presa dell’Unione Europea contro l’Ungheria che ha legiferato delle limitazioni all’operatività delle ong sul suo territorio.
Nessuno si stupisce più di tanto della contraddizione, ma alla fine le costruzioni contraddittorie crollano rovinosamente.
→ Deutsche Welle. 2017-07-19. Refugee rescue NGOs reject human trafficking charges
Germany and Austria’s interior ministers have accused private initiatives to save refugees in the Mediterranean of intentionally working with people smugglers. The accusation has sparked outrage and may not even be true.
Austrian Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka has called for legal “punishments” for NGO workers who pick migrants in danger of drowning out of the Mediterranean.
“We have to stop so-called helpers from entering Libyan waters and directly taking refugees from human traffickers,” Sobotka told Germany’s Bild newspaper. “It’s crucial that self-appointed emergency sea rescuers no longer cooperate with the [people smuggling] rings.”
Those sentiments were seconded, in less direct form, by Germany’s conservative Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere in a separate newspaper interview. He cited Italian accusations that NGO rescue boats concealed their transponder positions from coast guards and turned on their lights to give boatloads of refugees a “goal.”
The NGOs in question were outraged at the two interior ministers’ remarks. In an email, the German organization Sea Watch called the accusations part of a “campaign of defamation.”
“We don’t want to let ourselves get turned into a plaything for European interior and foreign ministers, whose statements repeatedly make for headlines about ocean rescues and human traffickers,” Sea Watch spokeswoman Theresa Leisgang wrote. “More NGO boats means fewer dead – that’s all there is to it.”
Doctors Without Borders also said in a statement that there wasn’t “a shred of evidence” supporting de Maiziere and Sobotka’s claims.
The charge that NGO rescue ships, intentionally or not, help encourage would-be migrants to attempt the treacherous Mediterranean crossing in overcrowded and unseaworthy boats isn’t new, but it has never been leveled so directly by such high-ranking government representatives. Italy, where the vast majority of those rescued at sea are taken, drew up a controversial code of conduct for NGO sea rescuers last week which also implied that they, willingly or not, were abetting the people traffickers. And the EU wants to restrict the sale to Libya of the sort of boats typically used for crossings.
Pulling people to Europe or merely out of danger?
Some 90,000 migrants have arrived in Italy by sea this year, according to the United Nations. The Italian Defense Ministry has compiled statistics showing that the proportion of refugees rescued at sea by NGOs went from 0.87 percent in 2014 to 26.23 percent last year.
Europol’s European Migrant Smuggling Centre told DW that there are currently “no cases with an NGO involvement at the core of the investigation.” But spokesman Jan Op Gen Oorth added, “We cannot exclude that organized crime gangs involved in migrant smuggling assume that migrants will be picked up by NGOs very close to the shore, rather than sail all the way to Italy and that the migrant smugglers take advantage of this.”
The European border control agency Frontex has advanced the idea that the presence of NGO rescuers has created a “pull effect” encouraging would-be migrants to try their luck and are thus indirectly abetting people smugglers. But anti-human trafficking groups like La Strada in the Netherlands, which isn’t involved in ocean rescues, say that they see no direct connection between the number of rescue boats and people risking their lives to reach Europe.
“There are far more factors at work,” La Strada International Coordinator Suzanne Hoff told DW. “People leave because of what’s going on in their countries of origin.”
That view is supported by recent academic research.
A toxic narrative?
A study published last month by Goldsmiths College entitled “Blaming the Rescuers” disputes the idea of a pull effect and the notion that rescuers are inadvertently making crossings more dangerous. The report says that belief has created a “toxic narrative” discrediting NGO search and rescue missions.
The study acknowledged that the number and danger of Mediterranean crossings, as well as the number of deaths and mortality rate, increased from 2015 to 2016, but finds that none of these trends was causally related to the activities of NGO missions.
Statistics show that attempted crossings from northern Africa were on the rise before the increase in NGO activities.
They also demonstrate that crossings were already getting more dangerous because of a change in the human traffickers’ strategy in response to governmental anti-smuggling efforts and deteriorating conditions in Libya – although NGO activities may have encouraged smugglers to consolidate those tactics.
“NGOs were not the cause of increased crossings and shifting smugglers’ tactics, but were rather a fundamental civilian response to a dire situation that was not of their making,” the report concluded.
Blowback from NGOs and the opposition
Video footage of NGO rescues highlight the dangers involved in the Mediterranean crossings.
The Goldsmiths report takes European leaders to task for failing to address the conditions in northern Africa that cause people to migrate and urges those people be given legal avenues for migration. That’s a point also made by the NGOs.
“We think that if you give people more rights, more information and more chances to legally migrate, then you actually prevent human trafficking,” said Hoff.
“The human trafficking problem starts on land,” UNICEF spokeswoman Sarah Crowe told DW. “When the migrants are at sea, it’s already too late.”
Politicians from the other parties in Germany vehemently rejected de Maiziere’s statements. Social Democratic chairman and chancellor candidate Martin Schulz tweeted that he didn’t want to see the Mediterranean turned into a “mass grave.”
The opposition was even more scathing. Jens Korte of the Left Party condemned what he called “organized European state failure” and said that if de Maiziere “had problems with aid organizations saving people from drowning, he should ensure that state institutions do it.”
Green Party co-chair Katrin-Göring Eckardt accused de Maiziere of trying to up “hostility toward refugees” with unfounded accusations.