Pubblicato in: Criminalità Organizzata, Devoluzione socialismo, Senza categoria, Trump

Trump chiude i confini ai rifugiati islamici. – NYT Editoriale.

Giuseppe Sandro Mela.

2017-01-29.

2017-01-29__quarto_potere

L’attenta lettura del testo completo del provvedimento sarebbe cosa utile per meglio comprendere il problema:

Full Executive Order Text: Trump’s Action Limiting Refugees Into the U.S.

*

Eguale attenzione si riservi ai seguenti articoli.

Trump Administration Holds Off on Issuing U.N. Funding Order  

Trump’s Immigration Order Expands the Definition of ‘Criminal’ JAN. 26, 2017

* * * * * * *

In sintesi, l’ordine esecutivo prevede:

– chiusura dei confini nazionali ai migranti;

– sospensione temporanea dell’immigrazione da Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen;

– sospensione sine die dell’immigrazione dalla Siria;

– accoglienza preferenziale di cristiani rispetto ai mussulmani.

*

Questi provvedimenti si integrano con altri in fieri, principalmente:

«The Trump administration is delaying its plans to issue two executive orders that would reduce funding to the United Nations and begin a process to review and potentially cancel certain multilateral treaties, according to current and former officials briefed on the matter.

Both draft orders were submitted to the national Security Council for approval» [Fonte]

* * * * * * *

«President Trump on Friday closed the nation’s borders to refugees from around the world, ordering that families fleeing the slaughter in Syria be indefinitely blocked from entering the United States, and temporarily suspending immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries»

*

«In an executive order that he said was part of an extreme vetting plan to keep out “radical Islamic terrorists,” Mr. Trump also established a religious test for refugees from Muslim nations: He ordered that Christians and others from minority religions be granted priority over Muslims»

*

«We want to ensure that we are not admitting into our country the very threats our soldiers are fighting overseas. We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country, and love deeply our people»

*

«Christians in Syria were “horribly treated” and alleged that under previous administrations, “if you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible»

*

«The order also stops the admission of refugees from Syria indefinitely, and bars entry into the United States for 90 days from seven predominantly Muslim countries linked to concerns about terrorism. Those countries are Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen»

* * * * * * *

* * * * * * *

In perfetto stile liberal, l’articolista del The New York Times si premura di riportare anche

«Human rights activists roundly condemned Mr. Trump’s actions, describing them as officially sanctioned religious persecution dressed up to look like an effort to make the United States safer»

*

«The International Rescue Committee called it “harmful and hasty.”»

*

«The American Civil Liberties Union described it as a “euphemism for discriminating against Muslims.”»

*

Il The New York Times assume che le

opinioni espresse da queste organizzazioni

siano la “Voce dell’America“,

ossia di tutti gli americani.

* * *

Poniamo adesso alcune domande.

– Chi mai saranno codeste organizzazioni?

– Cosa, chi e quanti voti rappresentano?

*

«The International Rescue Committee (IRC) is a global humanitarian aid, relief and development nongovernmental organization. Founded in 1933 at the request of Albert Einstein, the IRC offers emergency aid and long-term assistance to refugees and those displaced by war, persecution or natural disaster. The IRC is currently working in over 40 countries and 22 U.S. cities where it resettles refugees and helps them become self-sufficient. The President of the International Rescue Committee is former British Foreign Secretary David Miliband.

Consisting of first responders, humanitarian relief workers, international development experts, health care providers, and educators, the IRC has assisted millions of people around the world since its founding in 1933. ….

For refugees afforded sanctuary in the United States, IRC resettlement offices across the country provide a range of assistance aimed at helping new arrivals settling, adjusting and acquiring the skills to become self-sufficient.

The IRC also engages in advocacy efforts on behalf of the oppressed and displaced ….

Gender-based violence is any harm perpetrated against a person based on power inequalities resulting from gender roles. The overwhelming majority of cases involve women and girls. The IRC’s gender-based anti-violence programs aim to meet the safety, health, psychosocial and justice needs of women and girls who are survivors of or vulnerable to gender-based violence. In partnership with communities and institutions, the IRC works to empower communities to lead efforts that challenge beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors that perpetuate or condone violence against women and girls.

IRC programs implement and support social work services to help individual survivors of gender-based violence, economic empowerment activities to support survivors of violence and women and girls at-risk of violence, community education and mobilization projects around gender-based violence, training and capacity-building for NGOs and governments, coordination of humanitarian services, and advocacy efforts to advance laws preventing violence against women, and the enforcement of policies ensuring survivors’ access to care and legal justice.» [Fonte]

Patrimonio di 195.3 mln Usd, fatturato 397.9 mln Usd.

Gestisce grant federali e delle Nazioni Unite per diverse decine di miliardi.

«The organization is governed by a volunteer unpaid board of directors.»

Il board direzionale si rinnova per cooptazione.

* * *

«L’American Civil Liberties Union (Unione Americana per le Libertà Civili, sigla ACLU) è un’organizzazione non governativa orientata a difendere i diritti civili e le libertà individuali negli Stati Uniti.

Le cause legali intentate dall’ACLU hanno avuto un ruolo importante in molte delle evoluzioni del diritto costituzionale degli Stati Uniti. L’ACLU procura avvocati e consigli legali per casi in cui a suo parere sono violati i diritti civili e le libertà individuali. In molti casi in cui non fornisce rappresentanti legali, l’ACLU prepara documenti legali di appello in sostegno alle sue posizioni (i cosiddetti amicus curiae). Negli anni recenti, l’ACLU ha ricevuto critiche e accuse di essere schierata con la sinistra politica. ….

*

Nel 2004, per esempio, l’ACLU della California del Sud minacciò di passare alle vie legali contro il comune di Redlands (California) se non fosse stata rimossa l’immagine di una croce dal sigillo comunale. L’ACLU sosteneva che la presenza di un crocifisso sul sigillo ammontava a sostegno governativo per il cristianesimo e violava così la separazione tra stato a chiesa. Il comune acconsentì alla richiesta dell’ACLU e rimosse la croce da tutti i veicoli comunali, dalla carta intestata, e dalle targhette dei poliziotti. Poi l’ACLU minacciò la contea di Los Angeles sempre per la presenza di una croce nel sigillo ufficiale. Come per il caso di Redlands, anche questa volta il comune acconsentì alla richiesta e votò per la rimozione del crocefisso dal proprio sigillo. ….

In addition to representing persons and organizations in lawsuits, the ACLU lobbies for policies that have been established by its board of directors. Current positions of the ACLU include: opposing the death penalty; supporting same-sex marriage and the right of gays to adopt; supporting birth control and abortion rights; eliminating discrimination against women, minorities, and LGBT people; supporting the rights of prisoners and opposing torture; and opposing government preference for religion over non-religion, or for particular faiths over others.» [Fonte]

Le cariche direttive si rinnovano per cooptazione.

Aclu ha uno staff di circa 200 avvocati, fiancheggiati da altri 2,000 volontari. Il budget ammonta a 133.4 mln Usd, ma gestisce fondi federali ed internazionali per decine di miliardi. Conterebbe 500,000 membri.

L’Aclu rapprenterebbe quindi lo 0.15% della popolazione americana: un po’ pochino per farsi considerare la “voce dell’America

* * * * * * *

Riassumendo.

Le “Voci dell’America” citate dal The New York Times sono organizzazioni chiuse, la cui dirigenza è cooptata o nominata, per loro stessa ammissione di evidente matrice liberals, che vivono ed agiscono grazie ai fondi federali ed internazionali che ricevono e gestiscono.

Esse rappresentano meno dello 0.2% della popolazione degli Stati Uniti, il due per mille.

Sono state ininfluenti nelle passate elezioni di novembre.

Il The New York Times mente, e lo fa ben sapendo di mentire, quando indica le loro prese di posizione come quelle dell’intera popolazione degli Stati Uniti.


The New York Times. 2017-01-28. Trump Bars Refugees and Citizens of 7 Muslim Countries

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Friday closed the nation’s borders to refugees from around the world, ordering that families fleeing the slaughter in Syria be indefinitely blocked from entering the United States, and temporarily suspending immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries.

In an executive order that he said was part of an extreme vetting plan to keep out “radical Islamic terrorists,” Mr. Trump also established a religious test for refugees from Muslim nations: He ordered that Christians and others from minority religions be granted priority over Muslims.

“We don’t want them here,” Mr. Trump said of Islamist terrorists during a signing ceremony at the Pentagon. “We want to ensure that we are not admitting into our country the very threats our soldiers are fighting overseas. We only want to admit those into our country who will support our country, and love deeply our people.”

Earlier in the day, Mr. Trump explained to an interviewer for the Christian Broadcasting Network that Christians in Syria were “horribly treated” and alleged that under previous administrations, “if you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible.”

“I thought it was very, very unfair. So we are going to help them,” the president said.

In fact, the United States accepts tens of thousands of Christian refugees. According to the Pew Research Center, almost as many Christian refugees (37,521) were admitted as Muslim refugees (38,901) in the 2016 fiscal year.

The executive order suspends the entry of refugees into the United States for 120 days and directs officials to determine additional screening ”to ensure that those approved for refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States.”

The order also stops the admission of refugees from Syria indefinitely, and bars entry into the United States for 90 days from seven predominantly Muslim countries linked to concerns about terrorism. Those countries are Iraq, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

Additionally, Mr. Trump signed a memorandum on Friday directing what he called “a great rebuilding of the armed services,” saying it would call for budget negotiations to acquire new planes, new ships and new resources for the nation’s military.

“Our military strength will be questioned by no one, but neither will our dedication to peace,” Mr. Trump said.

Announcing his “extreme vetting” plan, the president invoked the specter of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Most of the 19 hijackers on the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pa., were from Saudi Arabia. The rest were from the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Lebanon. None of those countries are on Mr. Trump’s visa ban list.

Human rights activists roundly condemned Mr. Trump’s actions, describing them as officially sanctioned religious persecution dressed up to look like an effort to make the United States safer.

The International Rescue Committee called it “harmful and hasty.” The American Civil Liberties Union described it as a “euphemism for discriminating against Muslims.” Raymond Offensheiser, the president of Oxfam America, said the order would harm families around the world who are threatened by authoritarian governments.

“The refugees impacted by today’s decision are among the world’s most vulnerable people — women, children, and men — who are simply trying to find a safe place to live after fleeing unfathomable violence and loss,” Mr. Offensheiser said.

The president signed the executive order shortly after issuing a statement noting that Friday was International Holocaust Remembrance Day, an irony that many of his critics highlighted on Twitter. The statement did not mention Jews, although it cited the “depravity and horror inflicted on innocent people by Nazi terror.”

Mr. Trump’s actions came during a swearing-in ceremony for Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, a former Marine general. Standing in the Hall of Heroes at the Pentagon, Mr. Trump hailed the members of America’s military as “the backbone of this country” and described Mr. Mattis as a “man of action.” The president mistakenly referred to Mr. Mattis as a “soldier,” a term abhorred by Marines.

Mr. Trump has been deferential to Mr. Mattis, who has quickly established himself as a top aide whose advice the president is willing to take. On Friday, Mr. Trump said he would let Mr. Mattis “override” him by banning torture during terror interrogations even though Mr. Trump believes the tactics do work in getting information from suspects.

In a remarkable show of deference to his own subordinate, Mr. Trump said during an earlier news conference Friday morning with Theresa May, the British prime minister, that he would let Mr. Mattis decide about whether to use torture in interrogations. Mr. Mattis has said he does not believe torture is effective.

“I don’t necessarily agree, but I will tell you that he will override because I’m giving him that power,” Mr. Trump said. “I’m going to rely on him. I happen to feel that it does work.”

Mr. Trump appeared to be struggling with the issue even as he spoke, returning several times to his own belief in the effectiveness of torture even as he stated that he would let Mr. Mattis decide.

“But I’m going with our leaders,” he said. “We are going to win, with or without.”

Then he added, “But I do disagree.”

Mr. Mattis spent his first week as defense secretary trying to reassure not only American allies, but also military rank and file, that the United States will not abandon a national security structure that has stood in place since the end of World War II. He has told officials in the Pentagon building that at an uncertain time, he intends, as defense secretary, to provide an even-keeled, measured approach to national security issues.

Before the signing ceremony, Mr. Trump met with Mr. Mattis and his military chiefs for about an hour. The meeting — which took place in a Pentagon secure room known as “the tank” — included introductions for Mr. Trump to his military chiefs of staff. The meeting was attended by Michael Flynn, the national security adviser; Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the chiefs of the four services and the National Guard.

The men discussed how to accelerate the fight against the Islamic State and North Korea and how to deal with a host of global challenges, said a defense official who was not authorized to talk publicly about the internal talks. The leaders also discussed how to improve military readiness.

The newly sworn-in secretary of defense also gave Mr. Trump a little of what the president has been asking — or tweeting — for. On Thursday, Mr. Mattis ordered a review of the controversial F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, which has been criticized by Mr. Trump for its cost overruns.

Mr. Mattis also ordered that plans for a new Air Force One — another project that has come under fire from Mr. Trump — should be reviewed, “with the specific objective of identifying means to substantially reduce the program’s costs while delivering needed capabilities.”

The F-35 review, Mr. Mattis said in a memo, will also look at how to reduce costs while still meeting requirements set out for the fighter jet program.

During his confirmation hearings this month, Mr. Mattis defended Twitter messages from Mr. Trump criticizing the F-35 program. Mr. Mattis said at the time that Mr. Trump had “in no way shown a lack of support for the program,” adding, “He just wants more bang for the buck.”

The cost of building the F-35 next-generation fighter jet has been an issue at the Pentagon for several years. At an estimated $400 billion over 15 years for 2,443 planes, the fighter jet is the military’s largest weapons project.

Annunci

Un pensiero riguardo “Trump chiude i confini ai rifugiati islamici. – NYT Editoriale.

I commenti sono chiusi.